فصلنامه اندازه گیری تربیتی

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

اخبار و اعلانات

راهنمای نگارش مقاله

فایل ها

داوران سال 1398

داوران سال 1399

داوران سال 1400

داوران سال 1401

ویژگی‏ های روان‌سنجی نسخه فارسی مقیاس منابع خودکارآمدی مشاوران مدرسه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد، گروه مشاوره، دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران، ایران

2 دانشجوی دکتری مشاوره، دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران، ایران

3 دانشجوی دکتری مشاوره، دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

مقیاس منابع خودکارآمدی مشاوره (SCSE-M) یک مقیاس خودگزارشی برای سنجش خودکارآمدی است که با 25 ماده بر نحوه عملکرد مشاوران تمرکز دارد بااین‌حال این مقیاس تاکنون در جامعه ایرانی موردبررسی قرار نگرفته و ویژگی روان‌سنجی آن برآورد نشده است. هدف از پژوهش حاضر در مرحله اول ترجمه این مقیاس از زبان انگلیسی به زبان فارسی و سپس تعیین ویژگی‏های روان‌سنجی آن در نمونه ایرانی بود. نمونه پژوهش شامل 297 نفر از مشاوران شهر تهران در سال 1400 بود که به شیوه غیرتصادفی در دسترس انتخاب شده و به ابزار پژوهش شامل مقیاس منابع خودکارآمدی مشاوره (2020)، مقیاس خودکارآمدی عمومی (1995)، مقیاس شکوفایی Deiner (2010)، مقیاس خودکارآمدی مشاوران (2009) پاسخ دادند. داده‏ها با استفاده از روش تحلیل عاملی تأییدی موردبررسی قرار گرفت. بر اساس یافته‏ها، اعتبار صوری، محتوا و سازه نشان‌دهندة اعتبار و پایایی مناسب این ابزار بود. همچنین اعتبار همگرا (AVE>0/50)، برای این پرسش‌نامه تعیین و تأیید شد. برای بررسی پایایی و همسانی درونی مقیاس منابع خودکارآمدی مشاوران از پایایی ترکیبی و ضریب آلفای کرونباخ استفاده شد که نتایج نشان داد که این مقیاس از همسانی درونی و پایایی ترکیبی مناسبی برخوردار است. درنهایت تحلیل ماتریس همبستگی مربوط به متغیرهای مطالعه نشان داد که مقیاس منابع خودکارآمدی مشاوره با مقیاس خودکارآمدی عمومی، مقیاس شکوفایی دینر، مقیاس خودکارآمدی مشاوران و سن و سابقه فعالیت همبستگی مثبت و معنادار داشته است (01/0<p). روی‌هم‌رفته نتایج پژوهش حاضر مبین آن بود که این مقیاس در نمونه ایرانی از ویژگی روان‌سنجی مطلوبی برخوردار است و مخصوصاً می‏توان آن را در نمونه‏های ایرانی برای بررسی خودکارآمدی مشاوره با اطمینان استفاده نمود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Psychometric Characteristics of the Persian Version of the School Counselors Self-Efficacy Resource Scale

نویسندگان [English]

  • Simin Hosseinian 1
  • Sara Karimi 2
  • Faezeh Peimanpak 3

1 Professor, Department of Counseling, Alzahra University, Tehran

2 Ph.D. Student in Counseling, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran

3 Ph.D. Student in Counseling, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

The Sources of Counseling Self-Efficacy Scale, Malaysia (SCSE-M) is a self-report scale that measures self-efficacy with a focus on how counselors work with 25 items; however, this scale has not been investigated and psychometrically evaluated in Iranian society. The aim of the current study was, in the first step, to translate this scale from English to Persian and then to determine its psychometric properties in Iranian samples. The survey sample consisted of 297 of his 1400 Tehran city counselors, selected in a Convenience non-random sampling, and they responded to the research tools including Counseling Self-Efficacy Scale (2020), General Self-Efficacy Scale (1995), Deiner Flourishing Scale (2010), and Counselors Self-Efficacy Scale (2009). The data were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis. According to the findings, face validity, content, and structure showed the appropriate validity and reliability of this tool. We used the combined reliability and Cronbach's alpha coefficient to assess the reliability and internal consistency of the Counselor Self-Efficacy Resource Scale, and the results showed that this scale has good internal consistency and composite reliability. Finally, the analysis of the correlation matrix related to the variables of the study showed that the Counseling Self-Efficacy Resource Scale had a positive and significant correlation with the general self-efficacy scale (GSE-10), Deiner Flourishing Scale, Counselors Self-Efficacy Scale, age and activity experience (p<0.01). The results of the present study demonstrated that this scale has favorable statistical properties in Iranian samples and can be reliably used in Iranian samples to assess self-efficacy in counseling.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Counseling self-efficacy sources
  • School
  • Consultant
  • Scale
  • Validity
  • Reliability
مراجع
اصل دهقان، فاطمه؛ پورشهریاری، مه‏سیما و مهراندیش، ندا (1400). تدوین مدل شکوفایی بر اساس خودکارامدی با واسطه‏گری امید در مشاوران و روانشناسان. فصلنامه فرهنگ مشاوره و روان‏درمانی، 12(46). 108-81.. https://doi.org/10.22054/qccpc.2021.57419.2603
باقری، معصومه و باقرزاده، غزل. (1401). مدل ساختاری عوامل مؤثر بر نگرش به تبعیض جنسیتی در میان زنان شاغل شهر بهبهان. توسعه اجتماعی، 16(3)، 122-93. 10.22055/QJSD.2022.40606.2650
حسنی، مژگان؛ نادی خوراسگانی، محمدعلی. (1395). بررسی ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی و هنجاریابی مقیاس شکوفایی در دانش‌آموزان دختر پایه سوم دبیرستان. پژوهش‌نامه روان‌شناسی مثبت، 2(1)، 74-63. 10.22108/PPLS.2016.21297
حق‏شناس، سارا؛ ابوالمعالی ابوالحسینی، خدیجه (1401). طراحی الگوی مفهومی تبیین موفقیت شغلی مشاوران مدارس. فصلنامه فرهنگ مشاوره و روان‏درمانی، 13(49)، 94-77. https://doi.org/10.22054/qccpc.2021.62017.2738
دلاور، علی؛ نجفی، محمود؛ محمدرضایی، علی؛ دبیری، سولماز؛ رضایی، نورمحمد. (1392). خصوصیات روان‌سنجی مقیاس خودکارآمدی عمومی در کارکنان عمومی دانشگاه. فصلنامه اندازه‌گیری تربیتی، 4(12)، 104-87. https://jem.atu.ac.ir/article_5663.html
 
Aliyev, R., & Tunc, E. (2015). Self-efficacy in counseling: The role of organizational psychological capital, job satisfaction, and burnout. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 190, 97-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.922
Asl Dehghan, F., Pourshahriari, M., Mehrandish, N. (2021). Develop a model of flourishing based on self-efficacy mediated by hope in counselors and psychologists. Counseling and Psychotherapy Culture Quarterly, 12(46), 81-108. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22054/qccpc.2021.57419.2603
Asarli, Z. (2012). Investigation of school counselor self-efficacy levels of counselors working in school. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Ege University Social Sciences Institute, Izmir.
Asl-Dehghan, F., Hosseinian, S., & Abdollahi, A. (2022). Psychometric assessment of the Persian version of the psychologist and counselor self-efficacy scale among Iranian psychologists and counselors. Current Psychology,42, 20583 - 20590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03020-2
Bagheri, M., & Bagherzadeh, G. (2022). Structural Model of Factors Affecting the Attitude towards Gender Discrimination among Working Women in Behbahan. Journal of Social Development, 16(3), 93-122. [In Persian]10.22055/QJSD.2022.40606.2650
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986(23-28).
Burckhardt, R., Manicavasagar, V., Batterham, P. J., & Hadzi-Pavlovic, D. (2016). A randomized controlled trial of strong minds: A school-based mental health program combining acceptance and commitment therapy and positive psychology. Journal of school psychology, 57, 41-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2016.05.008. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
Carpenter, D. M., & Clayton, G. (2014). Measuring the relationship between self-efficacy and math performance among first-generation college-bound middle school students. Middle Grades Research Journal, 9(2), 109-126.
Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Biswas-Diener, R., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D.-w., & Oishi, S. (2009). New measures of well-being Assessing well-being (pp. 247-266): Springer.
Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D.-w., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social indicators research, 97(2), 143-156. DOI:10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y
Delavar, A., & Najafi, M. (2013). The psychometric properties of the general self efficacy scale among university staff. Educational Measurement, 4(12), 104-87. [In Persian] https://jem.atu.ac.ir/article_5663.html
Farnia, V., Asadi, R., Abdoli, N., Radmehr, F., Alikhani, M., Khodamoradi, M.,... Salemi, S. (2020). Psychometric properties of the Persian version of General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) among substance abusers the year 2019–2020 in Kermanshah city. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health, 8(3), 949-953. DOI:10.1016/j.cegh.2020.03.002
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Freed, M. R. (2013). Antecedents of mathematics self-efficacy beliefs for middle and high school students: An instrument validation study: Seattle Pacific University.
Gangloff, B., & Mazilescu, C.-A. (2017). Normative characteristics of perceived self-efficacy. Social Sciences, 6(4), 139.
Green, Z. A. (2020). The mediating effect of well-being between generalized self-efficacy and vocational identity development. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 20(2), 215-241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-019-09401-7
Haghshenas, S., & Abolmaali Alhoseini, KH. (2022). Designing a conceptual model to explain the job success of school counselors. Quarterly of Counseling Culture and Psychotherapy, 13(49), 77-94. [In Persian]https://doi.org/10.22054/qccpc.2021.62017.2738
Hassani, M., & Nadi, M. A. (2016). 2 Associate Professor, Department of educational Science, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran. Positive Psychology Research, 2(1), 63-74. [In Persian] 10.22108/PPLS.2016.21297
Harrison, M. G. (2022). Therapeutic change processes in school-based counselling: the perspectives of students and counsellors in Hong Kong. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 50(2), 215-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2020.1729340
Jackson, R. (2014). Sources of Math Self-Efficacy: A Case Study of Students in Game Design.
Kern, M. L., Williams, P., Spong, C., Colla, R., Sharma, K., Downie, A.,... Oades, L. G. (2020). Systems informed positive psychology. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 15(6), 705-715. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2019.1639799
Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Guilford publications.
Kontas, H., & Özcan, B. (2017). Adapting Sources of Middle School Mathematics Self-Efficacy Scale to Turkish Culture. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 6(4), 288-294. DOI: http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v6i4.10771
Kudrinskaia, I. V., Kidinov, A. V., Kabkova, E. P., Mechkovskaya, O. A., Mudrak, S. A., Novikov, S. B., & Agadzhanova, E. R. (2020). The problem of career guidance of the youth in domestic pedagogical theory and practice. EurAsian Journal of BioSciences, 14(2).
Lane, J. J., Bohner, G. L., Hinck, A. M., & Kircher, R. L. (2020). Current Administrative Perceptions of School Counselors: Kansas Administrators' Perceptions of School Counselor Duties. Journal of School Counseling, 18(2), n2.
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel psychology, 28(4), 563-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
Lonner, W. J., & Berry, J. W. (1986). Field methods in cross-cultural research: Sage Publications, Inc.
Loo, C. W., & Choy, J. (2013). Sources of self-efficacy influencing academic performance of engineering students. American Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 86-92. DOI:10.12691/education-1-3-4
Lowery, K., Boyland, L. G., Geesa, R. L., Kim, J., Quick, M. M., & McDonald, K. M. (2020). Principal and school counselor collaboration toward more socially just schools. Handbook on promoting social justice in education, 455-480.
Lunenburg, F. C. (2011). Self-efficacy in the workplace: Implications for motivation and performance. International journal of management, business, and administration, 14(1), 1-6.
Mayes, R. D., & Byrd, J. A. (2022). An Antiracist Framework for Evidence-Informed School Counseling Practice. Professional School Counseling, 26(1a), 2156759X221086740.
McKim, A. J., & Velez, J. J. (2016). An Evaluation of the Self-Efficacy Theory in Agricultural Education. Journal of Agricultural Education, 57(1), 73-90.
Mittal, S., & Dhar, R. L. (2015). Transformational leadership and employee creativity: mediating role of creative self-efficacy and moderating role of knowledge sharing. Management Decision.
Nguyen, H. A., Phuong, T. T., Le, T. T. B., & Vo, L. P. (2020). Vietnamese women entrepreneurs’ motivations, challenges, and success factors. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 22(2), 215-226. DOI:10.1177/1523422320907050
Nur Jannah Bali Mahomed, K. S. K. J., & Mohd Izwan, M. (2020). The Relationship between Counselling Self-Efficacy and Psychological Well-Being among School Counsellors. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(6s), 2900 - 2906.
Ooi, P. B., Wan Jaafar, W. M., Ang, C.-S., & Nee-Nee, C. (2020). Psychometric Properties of the Sources of Counseling Self Efficacy in a Sample of Malaysian Secondary School Counselors. SAGE Open, 10, 215824402090207. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020902076
Pajares, F., Johnson, M. J., & Usher, E. L. (2007). Sources of writing self-efficacy beliefs of elementary, middle, and high school students. Research in the Teaching of English, 104-120.
Palmer, D. (2011). Sources of Efficacy Information in an Inservice Program for Elementary Teachers. Science Education, 95, 577-600. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20434
Rumsey, A. D., Golubovic, N., Elston, N., Chang, C. Y., Dixon, A., & Guvensel, K. (2018). Addressing the social and emotional needs of refugee adolescents in schools: Learning from the experiences of school counselors. Journal of Child and Adolescent Counseling, 4(1), 81-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/23727810.2017.1351811
Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston, Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs, 35, 37. https://doi.org/10.1037/t00393-000
Sherer, M., Maddux, J. E., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R. W. (1982). The Self-Efficacy Scale: Construction and Validation. Psychological Reports, 51(2), 663-671. doi:10.2466/pr0.1982.51.2.663
Silva, A. J., & Caetano, A. (2013). Validation of the flourishing scale and scale of positive and negative experience in Portugal. Social indicators research, 110(2), 469-478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9938-y
Singh, K., Junnarkar, M., & Jaswal, S. (2016). Validating the flourishing scale and the scale of positive and negative experience in India. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 19(8), 943-954. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2016.1229289
Sumi, K. (2014). Reliability and validity of Japanese versions of the Flourishing Scale and the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience. Social Indicators Research, 118(2), 601-615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0432-6
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (20013). Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 6): Pearson education Inc.
Torunoğlu, H., & Gençtanirim, D. (2015). The Perceptions of School Counselors about the Counseling and Guidance Programs of Vocational High Schools. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 368-376. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.675
Unger, D. L. R., Steve; Anderson, Hannah R. (2021). Professional School Counselor and Principal Recognition of Appropriate and Inappropriate Activities. Journal of School Counseling, 19(13), 1-21.
Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy in mathematics: A validation study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(1), 89-101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.09.002
van Dinther, M., Dochy, F., & Segers, M. (2011). Factors affecting students’ self-efficacy in higher education. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 95-108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.10.003
Waltz, C. F., & Bausell, B. R. (1981). Nursing research: design statistics and computer analysis: Davis Fa.
Wilson, K., & Narayan, A. (2016). Relationships among individual task self-efficacy, self-regulated learning strategy use and academic performance in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Educational Psychology, 36(2), 236-253. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.926312
Zyromski, B., Hudson, T., & Baker, E. (2020). Guidance Counselors or School Counselors: How the Name of the Profession Influences Perceptions of Competence. Professional School Counseling, 22. doi:10.1177/2156759X19855654
فصلنامه اندازه گیری تربیتی
دوره 14، شماره 54
دی 1402
صفحه 56-78
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار