اعتباریابی نسخه کوتاه ابزار سنجش اعتماد یادگیرندگان به مهارت‌های اساسی در سدة 21 میلادی

نجفلو, پریسا; شکری, امید; الماسی, فاطمه

doi:10.22054/jem.2025.84049.3590

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

¹ گروه آموزشی روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.

² گروه آموزشی روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.

³ گروه آموزشی روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

https://doi.org/10.22054/jem.2025.84049.3590

چکیده

اگرچه با تغییر در منظرگاه آموزشی به‌سوی پداگوژی‌های شایستگی‌محور، توسعه‌مندی مهارت‌های تفکر سطح بالاتر یادگیرندگان، اولویت یافته است اما فقدان دسترسی به ابزارهای اندازه‌گیری مهارت‌های ارزش‌گذاری شده در برنامه‌های درسی نوظهور، در سدة 21 میلادی، انکارناشدنی است؛ بنابراین، این پژوهش با هدف اعتباریابی نسخة کوتاه ابزار سنجش اعتماد یادگیرندگان به مهارت‌های اساسی (Bray et al., 2020) در نوجوانان دختر و پسر انجام شد. 515 نوجوان (210 پسر و 315 دختر) به نسخه فارسی ابزار سنجش اعتماد یادگیرندگان به مهارت‌های اساسی، نسخه کوتاه ابزار سنجش ادراکات یادگیرندگان دربارة رویکردهای پداگوژیک سدة 21 میلادی (Bray et al., 2023) و مقیاس یادگیری خودراهبر (Lounsbury & Gibson, 2006)، پاسخ دادند. نتایج تحلیل عاملی تأییدی نشان داد که ابزار سنجش اعتماد یادگیرندگان به مهارت‌های اساسی با ساختاری مشتمل بر شش عامل همیاری، تعامل، تفکر انتقادی، خودجهت‌دهندگی، خلاقیت و نوآوری و استفاده از فناوری برای یادگیری، از روایی عاملی خوبی برخوردار بود. علاوه بر این، نتایج مربوط به همبستگی بین ابعاد اعتماد یادگیرندگان به مهارت‌های اساسی با ادراکات یادگیرندگان دربارة رویکردهای پداگوژیک سدة 21 میلادی و یادگیری خودراهبر در نوجوانان، از روایی همگرای نسخه نسخة کوتاه ابزار سنجش اعتماد یادگیرندگان به مهارت‌های اساسی، حمایت کرد. همچنین، مقادیرِ قابل‌قبول ضرایب همسانی درونیِ این ابزار سنجش، از پایایی نسخه فارسی ابزار مزبور، دفاع کرد. درمجموع، نتایج این پژوهش ضمن دفاع از مواضع مفهومی زیربنایی سازة اعتماد یادگیرندگان به مهارت‌های اساسی سدة 21 میلادی، از مشخصه‌های فنی روایی و پایایی نسخة کوتاه ابزار سنجش اعتماد یادگیرندگان به مهارت‌های اساسی نیز حمایت کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Validation of the Short Instrument for Measuring Students’ Confidence in 21st-Century Key Skills

نویسندگان [English]

Parisa Najafloo ¹
Omid Shokri ²
Fatemeh Almasi ³

¹ Department of Psychology, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.

² Department of Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

³ Department of Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Although the shift toward competency-based pedagogies in the educational landscape has prioritized the development of higher-order thinking skills for learners, the lack of access to tools for measuring valued skills within emerging 21st-century curricula is undeniable. Therefore, this study was conducted with the aim of validating the short instrument for measuring students’ confidence in key skills (Bray et al., 2020) among adolescent boys and girls. A total of 515 adolescents (210 boys and 315 girls) responded to the SICKS (the Short version of the Instrument for measuring students’ Confidence with Key Skills; Bray et al., 2020), the Students’ Perceptions of Pedagogy for 21st-Century Learning scale (Bray et al., 2023), and the Self-Directed Learning Scale (Lounsbury & Gibson, 2006). The results of the confirmatory factor analysis showed that the short instrument for measuring students’ confidence in key skills had good factorial validity, with a structure comprising six factors: collaboration, interaction, critical thinking, self-direction, creativity and innovation, and the use of technology for learning. Additionally, the results regarding the correlation between the dimensions of students’ confidence in key skills and learners’ perceptions of 21st-century pedagogical approaches and self-directed learning supported the convergent validity of the instrument. Furthermore, acceptable internal consistency coefficients supported the reliability of the Persian version of the assessment tool. Overall, the results of this study not only support the conceptual foundations of the short instrument for measuring students’ confidence in key skills for the 21st century but also affirm its technical validity and reliability.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

competency-based pedagogy
psychometric properties
essential skills
higher-order thinking

مراجع

موسوی، ش.، خدایی، ع.، و شکری، ا. (1403). مقیاس یادگیری خودراهبر در دانشجویان: روایی، پایایی و تغییرناپذیری اندازه‌گیری. فصلنامه اندازه‌گیری تربیتی، 15 (57)، 106-83.

الماسی، ف.، و شکری، ا. (زیر چاپ). تحلیل روان‌سنجی نسخه کوتاة ابزار سنجش ادراکات یادگیرندگان دربارة پداگوژی برای یادگیری در سدة 21 میلادی. مجلة مطالعات آموزش و یادگیری.

Affandi, H., Sunarno, W., & Harjana, G. (2024). Integrating creative pedagogy into problem-based learning: The effects on higher order thinking skills in science education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 53(1), Article 101575.

Almasi, F., & Shokri, O. (in press). Psychometric analysis of the short version of the Learners' Perceptions of Pedagogy for Learning in the 21st Century Scale. Journal of Education and Learning Studies. [In Persian]

Ananiadou, K., & Claro, M. (2009). 21st century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries (EDU Working Papers, No. 41). OECD Publishing.

Arbuckle, J. L., & Wothke, W. (1999). Amos 4.0 user’s guide: SPSS (pp. 240-260). Small Waters Corporation.

Bharathi, S. V., & Pande, M. B. (2024). Does constructivism learning approach lead to developing creative thinking skills? The mediating role of online collaborative learning environments. Journal of Computers in Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-024-00321-2

Bray, A., Byrne, P., & Kelly, M. (2020). A short instrument for measuring students' confidence with 'Key Skills' (SICKS): Development, validation and initial results. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, Article 100700.

Bray, A., Girvan, C., & Chorcora, E. N. (2023). Students’ perceptions of pedagogy for 21st century learning instrument (S-POP-21): Concept, validation, and initial results. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, Article 101319.

Brockett, R. G. (1983). Self-directed learning and the hard-to-reach adult. Lifelong Learning: The Adult Years, 6(8), 16–18.

Carabregu-Vokshi, M., Ogruk-Maz, G., Yildirim, S., Dedaj, B., & Zeqiri, A. (2024). 21st century digital skills of higher education students during Covid-19—Is it possible to enhance digital skills of higher education students through e-learning? Education and Information Technologies, 29, 103–137.

Delors, J. (1996). Learning: The treasure within: Report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century. UNESCO Publishing.

Dias-Oliveira, E., Pasion, R., da Cunha, R. V., & Coelho, S. L. (2024). The development of critical thinking, team working, and communication skills in a business school–A project-based learning approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 54, Article 101680.

European Commission. (2006). Key competences for lifelong learning - A European reference framework. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32006H0962

Ghanizadeh, A., Sadeghi Bajestani, G., & Beiraghi Toosi, M. (2024). Mindfulness-enhancing instruction (MEI): Contributions to electroencephalogram (EEG) dynamics, higher order thinking skills (HOTS), and effective learning. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 53(1), Article 101611.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed., pp. 125–857). Pearson Prentice Hall.

Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Guilford.

Kundurac, H. K. O., Yaral, K. T., & Kaynak, S. (2024). Measuring parental behaviors supporting higher order thinking skills in children: A scale development study. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 54, Article 101685.

Kuo, H. C. (2024). Transforming tomorrow: A practical synthesis of STEAM and PBL for empowering students’ creative thinking. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10511-0

Kwangmuang, P., Jarutkamolpong, S., Sangboonraung, W., & Daungtod, S. (2021). The development of learning innovation to enhance higher order thinking skills for students in Thailand junior high schools. Heliyon, 7, Article e07309.

Li, D., Fan, X., & Meng, L. (2024). Development and validation of a higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) scale for major students in the interior design discipline for blended learning. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 20287.

Li, W., Liu, C. Y., & Tseng, J. C. R. (2023). Effects of the interaction between metacognition teaching and students’ learning achievement on students’ computational thinking, critical thinking, and metacognition in collaborative programming learning. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 12919–12943.

Li, X., Ma, H., Liu, H., Li, X., Hu, Y., Jing, B., & Feng, C. (2024). Effects of 6E-based learning on students’ academic achievement, higher-order thinking skills, and attitudes towards STEM. Research in Science Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10220-2

Liu, J., Liu, Z., Wang, C., Li, X., & Xu, Y. (2024). Key factors and mechanisms affecting higher-order thinking skills of primary and secondary school students in the smart classroom environment. Current Psychology, 43, 9651–9664.

Lounsbury, J. W., & Gibson, L. W. (2006). Personal style inventory: A personality measurement system for work and school settings. Resource Associates, Inc.

Lounsbury, J. W., Levy, J. J., Park, S. H., Gibson, L. W., & Smith, R. (2009). An investigation of the construct validity of the personality trait of self-directed learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(4), 411–418.

Metin, S., Başaran, M., Seheryeli, M. Y., Relkin, E., & Kalyenci, D. (2024). Adaptation of the computational thinking skills assessment tool (TechCheck‑K) in early childhood. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 33, 365–382.

Meyers, L. S., Gamest, G., & Goarin, A. J. (2016). Applied multivariate research, design and interpretation. Sage Publications.

Mousavi, S., Khodaei, A., & Shokri, O. (2024). The self-directed learning scale in students: Validity, reliability, and measurement invariance. Quarterly Journal of Educational Measurement, 15(57), 83-106. [In Persian]

Nowlan, N., Arya, A., Qorbani, H. S., & Abdinejad, M. (2023). Higher-order thinking skills assessment in 3D virtual learning environments using motifs and expert data. Computers & Education: X Reality, 2, Article 100012.

Perez, E. P. J., Urrutia, M. L., Guirao, P. G., & Guzman, M. V. C. (2025). Design and validation of CRISENSE, a novel critical competence assessment tool for Spanish adolescents and young adults. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 56, Article 101708.

Ravitz, J., Hixson, N., English, M., & Mergendoller, J. (2012, April). Using project based learning to teach 21st century skills: Findings from a statewide initiative [Paper presentation]. American Educational Research Association Conference, Vancouver, Canada.

Rehman, N., Huang, X., Mahmood, A., AlGerafi, M. A. M., & Javed, S. (2024). Project-based learning as a catalyst for 21st-century skills and student engagement in the math classroom. Heliyon, 10, Article e39988.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed., p. 934). Allyn & Bacon.

Wang, H. H., & Wang, C. H. A. (2024). Teaching design students machine learning to enhance motivation for learning computational thinking skills. Acta Psychologica, 251, Article 104619.

Zhoc, K. C. H., & Chen, G. (2016). Reliability and validity evidence for the Self-Directed Learning Scale (SDLS). Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 245–250.

Zhong, Y., Guo, K., Fryer, L. K., Chu, S. K. W., & Deng, H. (2025). More than just fun: Investigating students’ perceptions towards the potential of leveraging esports for promoting the acquisition of 21st century skills. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 1089–1121.

فصلنامه اندازه گیری تربیتی

اعتباریابی نسخه کوتاه ابزار سنجش اعتماد یادگیرندگان به مهارت‌های اساسی در سدة 21 میلادی

مراجع

مراجع

دوره 17، شماره 63
فروردین 1405
صفحه 67-88

اعتباریابی نسخه کوتاه ابزار سنجش اعتماد یادگیرندگان به مهارت‌های اساسی در سدة 21 میلادی

مراجع

مراجع

دوره 17، شماره 63فروردین 1405صفحه 67-88

دوره 17، شماره 63
فروردین 1405
صفحه 67-88