نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مشاوره، دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران، ایران

2 استادیار گروه مشاوره، دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران، ایران

3 کارشناسی ارشد مشاوره خانواده، دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران، ایران

چکیده

عشق دلسوزانه به انسانیت یک مفهوم نسبتاً جدید است و تحقیقات قابل‌توجهی در دو دهه گذشته انجام شده است. با وجود اهمیت کاربردی عشق مشفقانه به انسانیت (CLS-H-SF) تاکنون هیچ پژوهشی بر روی نوجوانان انجام نشده است؛ بنابراین، هدف اصلی پژوهش حاضر بررسی ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی مقیاس عشق مشفقانه به انسانیت در نوجوانان بود که جهت کاربردهای مختلف، به‌ویژه در مشاوره تحصیلی- شغلی دانش‌آموزان دبیرستانی مفید خواهد بود. نمونه‌ای شامل 479 دانش‌آموز نوجوان داوطلب به مقیاس عشق مشفقانه به انسانیت، مقیاس فارسی عاطفه مثبت و منفی (PANAS)، مقیاس عزت‌نفس روزنبرگ (SES) و مقیاس رضایت از زندگی (SWLS) پاسخ دادند. به‌منظور ارزیابی روایی از همبستگی گویه‌ها با نمره کل و تحلیل عاملی تأییدی و جهت تعیین پایایی از آلفای کرونباخ استفاده شد. عشق مشفقانه به انسانیت با عاطفه مثبت، عزت‌نفس و رضایت از زندگی همبستگی مثبت و با عاطفه منفی همبستگی منفی داشت. تحلیل عاملی تأییدی از مدل تک عاملی پشتیبانی می‌کند و از سازگاری درونی خوبی برخوردار است. بر اساس یافته‌ها، نسخه فارسی مقیاس عشق مشفقانه به انسانیت در نوجوانان دارای ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی مناسب و مقیاسی پایا، معتبر و کوتاه است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Psychometric Properties of the Compassionate Love for Humanity Scale in Adolescents

نویسندگان [English]

  • Zahra Hajiheydari 1
  • Abbas Abdollahi 2
  • Somaye Ghiasi 3

1 Ph.D. Student in Counseling, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Counseling, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran

3 MA in Family Counseling, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

The concept of Compassionate Love for Humanity (CLS-H-SF) has gained popularity over the past two decades. However, its application among adolescents is scarce due to the absence of research. Therefore, this study sought to examine the psychometric properties of the CLS-H-SF Scale in adolescents to provide practical guidance, especially in academic- and career-counseling settings for high school students. A total of 479 adolescent student volunteers accessed the online survey, which included the following validated Persian versions of the measurement scales: The Compassionate Love for Humanity Scale, the Positive and Negative Affect Scales, the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and the Satisfaction with Life Scale. The validity of the scale was assessed via the correlation of items with the total score and confirmatory factor analysis. The reliability was determined using the Cronbach's Alpha Coefficient. The Compassionate Love for Humanity was positively correlated with positive affect, self-esteem, and life satisfaction, whereas it displayed a negative correlation with negative affect. The confirmatory factor analysis findings endorsed a one-factor model, and the internal consistency of the scale was deemed satisfactory. In conclusion, the Persian version of the Compassionate Love for Humanity Scale possesses acceptable psychometric properties and is a reliable, valid, and concise measure for adolescents.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • adolescent
  • compassionate love
  • compassion
  • reliability
  • validity
  • academic-career counseling
بخشی پوررودسری، عباس، و دژکام، محمود. (1384). تحلیل عاملی تأییدی مقیاس عاطفه مثبت و منفی. مجله روانشناسی، 9(4)، 351- 365.
بشلیده، کیومرث، یوسفی، ناصر، حقیقی، جمال، و بهروزی، ناصر. (1391). بررسی ساختار عاملی مقیاس عزت‌نفس روزنبرگ در دانشجویان دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز. مطالعات روانشناسی تربیتی، 9(15)، 41- 66.
بیانی، علی‌اصغر، کوچکی عاشور، محمد، و گودرزی، حسنیه. (1386). اعتبار و روایی مقیاس رضایت از زندگی. روانشناسی تحولی: روانشناسان ایرانی، 3(11)، 259-265.
حاجی‌زاده، ابراهیم، و اصغری، محمد. (1390). روش‌ها و تحلیل‌های آماری با نگاه به روش تحقیق در علوم زیستی و بهداشتی. تهران: جهاد دانشگاهی.
 
Abdollahi, A., Ahmed, A., Suksatan, W., Kumar, T., Majeed, M. S., Zainal, A. G., Dokoushkani, F., & Allen, K. A. (2022). Courage: A Potential Mediator of the Relationship Between Personality and Social Anxiety. Psychological studies, 1–10. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-022-00641-2
Bakhshiporrodsari, A., & Dezhkam, M. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis positive and negative affect schedule. Journal of Psychology, 9(4).351-365. [In Persian]. https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=50733
Bayani, A. A., Koocheky, A. M., & Goodarzi, H. (2007). The reliability and validity of the satisfaction with life scale. Dev Psychol, 3(11), 259-65. [In Persian].
Beshlideh, K., & Yousefi, N., & Haghighi, J., & Behrouzi, N. (2012). An investigation of psychometric properties of Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in student of Shaid ChamranUniversity in Ahwaz. Journal of Educational Psychology Studies, 9(15), 41-66. [In Persian]. https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=285731
Bhawuk, D., & Brislin, R. (2000). Cross-cultural training: a review. Applied Psychology, 49(1), 162-191. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00009
Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: a primer. Frontiers in public health, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301
Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203774762
Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with EQS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.
Chiesi, F., Lau, C., & Saklofske, D. H. (2020). A revised short version of the compassionate love scale for humanity (CLS-H-SF): evidence from item response theory analyses and validity testing. Journal of BMC Psychology, 8(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-020-0386-9
Cook, D. A., & Beckman, T. J. (2006). Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application. The American journal of medicine, 119(2), 166-e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.10.036
Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of personality assessment, 49(1), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
Dierendonck, D., Patterson, K. (2015). Compassionate Love as a Cornerstone of Servant Leadership: An Integration of Previous Theorizing and Research. Journal of Bus Ethics, 128, 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2085-z
Elvén, M., Hochwälder, J., Dean, E., Hällman, O., Söderlund, A. (2018). Criterion scores, construct validity and reliability of a web-based instrument to assess physiotherapists’ clinical reasoning focused on behaviour change: ‘Reasoning 4 Change’. AIMS Public Health, 5(3), 235–259. https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2018.3.235
Enwereuzor, I.K., & Ugwu, M.C (2021). Nexus Between Emotional Intelligence and Altruism as a Matter of Compassion for Others. Journal of Psychological Studies. 66, 97–104. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s12646-020-00592-6
Fehr, B., & Sprecher, S. (2009). Prototype analysis of the concept of compassionate love. Personal relationships, 16(3), 343-364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2009.01227.x
Fehr, B., Sprecher, S., & Underwood, L. G. (Eds.). (2009). The science of compassionate love: Theory, research, and applications. John Wiley & Sons.
Gilbert, P. (2021). Creating a compassionate world: addressing the conflicts between sharing and caring versus controlling and holding evolved strategies. Journal of Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 582090. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.582090
Gu, J., Baer, R., Cavanagh, K., Kuyken, W., & Strauss, C. (2020). Development and Psychometric Properties of the Sussex-Oxford Compassion Scales (SOCS). Assessment, 27(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191119860911
Hajiheydari, Z., Abdollahi, A., Jasim, S. A., Alghazali, T., Chupradit, S., McGlinchey, C., & Allen, K. A. (2022). The compassionate love for humanity scale (CLS-H-SF): psychometric properties of the Persian version. BMC psychology, 10(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-022-00776-x
Hajizadeh, E., & Asghari, M. (2011). Statistical methods and analyses in health and biosciences a research methodological approach. Tehran: Jahade Daneshgahi Publications. [In Persian].
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Ho, S. S., Nakamura, Y., & Swain, J. E. (2021). Compassion As an Intervention to Attune to Universal Suffering of Self and Others in Conflicts: A Translational Framework. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 603385. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.603385
Hwang, J.Y., Plante, T. & Lackey, K. (2008). The Development of the Santa Clara Brief Compassion Scale: An Abbreviation of Sprecher and Fehr’s Compassionate Love Scale. Journal of Pastoral Psychol, 56, 421–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-008-0117-2
Kanov, J. M., Maitlis, S., Worline, M. C., Dutton, J. E., Frost, P. J., & Lilius, J. M. (2004). Compassion in Organizational Life. Journal of American Behavioral Scientist, 47(6), 808–827. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764203260211
Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.
Kurtovic, A., Vrdoljak, G., & Hirnstein, M. (2021). Contribution to Family, Friends, School, and Community Is Associated with Fewer Depression Symptoms in Adolescents - Mediated by Self-Regulation and Academic Performance. Front. Psychol. 11:615249. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.615249
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
McDonald, M.A., Meckes, S.J. & Lancaster, C.L. (2021). Compassion for oneself and others protects the mental health of first responders. Journal of Mindfulness, 12(3), 659–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01527-y
Mersin, S., İbrahimoğlu, Ö., Çağlar, M., & Akyol, E. (2020). Compassionate love, burnout and professional commitment in nurses. Journal of nursing management, 28(1), 72-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12892
Neto, F., & Menezes, A. P. (2014). Psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the compassionate love for close others and humanity scale among older people. Educational Gerontology, 40(6), 458-467. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2013.852924
Novák, L., Malinakova, K., Mikoska, P., Furstova, J., Cann, R., & Tavel, P. (2021). Psychometric evaluation of the Santa Clara Brief Compassion Scale in the Czech environment (SCBCS). Journal of Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 24(3), 294-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2020.1850666
Ondrejková, N., & Halamová, J. (2022). Prevalence of compassion fatigue among helping professions and relationship to compassion for others, self-compassion and self-criticism. Health & social care in the community, 10.1111/hsc.13741. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13741
Petrocchi, N., Cosentino, T., Pellegrini, V., Femia, G., D’Innocenzo, A., &Mancini, F (2021). Compassion-Focused Group Therapy for Treatment-Resistant OCD: Initial Evaluation Using a Multiple Baseline Design. Journal of Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 3812. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.594277
Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in nursing & health, 30(4), 459-467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199
Pommier, E., Neff, K. D., & Tóth-Király, I. (2019). The development and validation of the compassion scale. Journal of Assessment, 27(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191119874108
Rose, M. S., Koshman, M.-L., Ritchie, D., & Sheldon, R. (2009). The development and preliminary validation of a scale measuring the impact of syncope on quality of life. Europace, 11(10), 1369–1374. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eup106
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.102
Smith, P. K. (2016). Adolescence: A Very Short Introduction. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Sprecher, S., & Fehr, B. (2005). Compassionate love for close others and humanity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22(5), 629–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407505056439
Strauss, C., Lever Taylor, B., Gu, J., Kuyken, W., Baer, R., Jones, F., & Cavanagh, K. (2016). What is compassion and how can we measure it? A review of definitions and measures. Clinical Psychology Review, 47, 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2016.05.004
Taber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Tahoon, R. (2021). Psychometric Characteristics of the Short Compassionate Love for Humanity Scale (CLS-H-SF) by Chiesi, Lau, and Saklofske on High School Students. The Egyptian Journal of Psychological Studies, 31(110), 211-230. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejcj.2021.145357
Watkins, D. (1989). The role of confirmatory factor analysis in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychology, 24(6), 685-701. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207598908247839
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063
Williams, B., Beovich, B., Ling, D., & Abbass, A. (2022). A psychometric study of the Compassionate Love Scale for Humanity Short version (CLS-H-SF) within a paramedicine student cohort. International Emergency Nursing, 61, 101115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ienj.2021.101115