نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار، گروه روانشناسی، واحد قوچان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قوچان، ایران

2 دانشجوی دکتری مشاوره، واحد بجنورد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بجنورد، ایران

چکیده

شایستگی‌های سواد دیجیتالی نقش محوری در رشد حرفه‌ای معلمان دارد. بااین‌وجود، فقدان ابزار کارآمد برای سنجش یادگیری دیجیتالی معلم، تحقیقات در این زمینه را با مشکل روبرو کرده است. هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی پرسشنامه هویت یادگیری دیجیتالی زیمر، مک تیگو و ماتسودا (2021) بود. روش پژوهش از نوع پیمایشی بود. جامعه آماری پژوهش کلیه معلمان مدارس شهر مشهد بودند که در سال تحصیلی 1400-1399 مشغول تدریس بودند. با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس و بر اساس فرمول کوکران حجم نمونه 420 نفر تعیین شد. پرسشنامه پس از ترجمه و رواسازی توسط متخصصان، به‌صورت الکترونیکی توزیع و تکمیل گردید. برای احراز روایی سازه از تحلیل عاملی تأییدی و برای پایایی از روش همسانی درونی استفاده شد. نتایج تحلیل عاملی تأییدی برازندگی مدل و ساختار روابط درونی گویه‌ها را تأیید کرد. ضریب آلفای کرونباخ برای کل پرسشنامه هویت یادگیری دیجیتالی برابر با 85/0 و برای عامل‌های یادگیری خودتنظیمی (‏86/0)‏، منابع دانش (‏91/0)‏، نگرش (‏91/0)‏، کارآمدی (‏91/0)، اهمیت دانش (‏91/0) ‏و چالش (‏90/0) به دست آمد. بحث و نتیجه‌گیری: پرسشنامه هویت یادگیری دیجیتالی معلمان از ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی قابل‌قبولی برخوردار است و می‌توان از آن به‌عنوان ابزاری معتبر در پژوهش‌ها استفاده کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Psychometric Properties of Teachers' Digital Learning Identity Questionnaire

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Mohammadipour 1
  • shabnam nourollahi 2

1 Associate Professor, Psychology Dept., Quchan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Quchan, Iran.

2 Ph.D. Student in Counseling, Quchan Bojnourd, Islamic Azad University, Bojnourd, Iran

چکیده [English]

Digital literacy competencies play a pivotal role in teachers' professional development. However, the absence of effective instrument for measuring teacher digital learning has hampered researches in this area. The aim of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of Zimmer, McTigue and Matsuda (2021) Digital Learning Identity Questionnaire. The research method was survey. The statistical population of the study was all school teachers in Mashhad who were teaching in the academic year 1399-1400. Using the available sampling method and based on Cochran's formula, the sample size was 420 people. The questionnaire was distributed and completed electronically after translation and validation by experts. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to determine the validity of the structure and internal consistency method (Cronbach's alpha) was used for reliability. The results of confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the fit of the model and the structure of the internal relations of the items. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the digital learning identity questionnaire was 0.97 and for self-regulated learning (0.86), Knowledge Resources (0.91), Attitude (0.91), efficacy (0.91), knowledge achievement (0.91) and challenge (0.90) were obtained. Conclusion: Teachers' digital learning identity questionnaire has acceptable psychometric properties and can be used as a valid instrument in research.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Digital Literacy Competencies
  • Validation
  • Reliability
  • Digital Learning Identity Questionnaire
  • Factor analysis
کارشکی، حسین. (1391). روابط ساختاری خطی در تحقیقات علوم انسانی (مبانی و راهنمای آسان کاربرد نرم‌افزار لیزرل). تهران: آوای نور.
کلاین، پل. (1381). راهنمای آسان تحلیل عاملی، ترجمه سید جلال صدرالسادات و اصغر مینایی. تهران: سمت.
هومن، حیدر علی. (1384). مدل یابی معادلات ساختاری با کاربرد نرم‌افزار لیزرل. تهران: انتشارات سمت.
References
Arar, K. (2017). Emotional expression at different managerial career stages: Female principals in Arab schools in Israel. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(6), 929-943.‏
Arar, K., & Oplatka, I. (2018). Emotion display and suppression among Arab and Jewish assistant principals in Israel: The key role of culture, gender and ethnicity. Journal of Professional Capital and Community.‏
Bahari, A. (2022). Teacher identity in technology-assisted language learning: Challenges and affordances. E-Learning and Digital Media, 19(4), 396-420.‏
Berkovich, I., & Eyal, O. (2015). Educational leaders and emotions: An international review of empirical evidence 1992–2012. Review of Educational Research, 85(1), 129-167.‏
Berkovich, I., & Eyal, O. (2017a). Methodological review of studies on educational leaders and emotions (1992-2012). Journal of Educational Administration.‏
Berkovich, I., & Eyal, O. (2017b). The mediating role of principals’ transformational leadership behaviors in promoting teachers’ emotional wellness at work: A study in Israeli primary schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(2), 316-335.
Blase, J., & Blase, J. (2004). The dark side of school leadership: Implications for administrator preparation. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3(4), 245-273.‏ doi: 10.1080/15700760490503733
Bozkurt, A., & Tu, C. H. (2016). Digital identity formation: Socially being real and present on digital networks. Educational Media International, 53(3), 153-167.‏
Brennan, J., & Mac Ruairc, G. (2011). Taking it personally: examining patterns of emotional practice in leading primary schools in the Republic of Ireland. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 14(2), 129-150.‏
Bridges, E. (2012). Administrator preparation: Looking backwards and forwards. Journal of Educational Administration.‏
Bruggeman B, Tondeur J, Struyven K, et al. (2021) Experts speaking: Crucial teacher attributes for implementing   blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education 48(1): 1–15.
Burić, I., Slišković, A., & Macuka, I. (2018). A mixed-method approach to the assessment of teachers’ emotions: development and validation of the Teacher Emotion Questionnaire. Educational psychology, 38(3), 325-349.‏
Bush, T. (2018). Preparation and induction for school principals: Global perspectives. Management in Education, 32(2), 66-71.‏
Byrne-Jimenez, M., & Orr, M. T. (2012). Thinking in three dimensions: Leadership for capacity-building, sustainability, and succession. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 15(3), 33–46. 2.
Cai, Q. (2011). Can principals' emotional intelligence matter to school turnarounds?. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 14(2), 151-179.‏
Chang, M. L. (2009a). An appraisal perspective of teacher burnout: Examining the emotional work of teachers. Educational psychology review, 21(3), 193-218.‏
Chen, J. (2016). Understanding teacher emotions: The development of a teacher emotion inventory. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 68-77. doi: 10.1016/j. tate. 2016.01.001.
Chen, J. (2020). Development and validation of the Principal Emotion Inventory: A mixed-methods approach. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 1741143220919764.‏
Cliffe, J. (2018). Emotional intelligence testing for headteachers: globalization or lost in translation. Journal of Professional Capital and Community.‏
Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2000). Evolutionary psychology and the emotions. Handbook of emotions, 2(2), 91-115.‏
Crawford, M. (2007). Rationality and emotion in primary school leadership: An exploration of key themes. Educational Review, 59(1), 87-98.‏
Crawford, M. (2018). Personal engagement, emotion and the educational workplace. Journal of professional capital and community.‏ 3(3): 223–240.
Cross, D. I., & Hong, J. Y. (2012). An ecological examination of teachers' emotions in the school context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(7), 957-967.‏
Dewa, C. S., Dermer, S. W., Chau, N., Lowrey, S., Mawson, S., & Bell, J. (2009). Examination of factors associated with the mental health status of principals. Work, 33(4), 439-448.‏
Earley, P., Collarbone, P., Evans, J., Gold, A., & Halpin, D. (2002). Establishing the current state of school leadership in England. Stationery Office.‏
Fink, D., & Brayman, C. (2006). School leadership succession and the challenges of change. Educational administration quarterly, 42(1), 62-89.‏
Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Stephens, E. J., & Jacob, B. (2009). Antecedents and effects of teachers’ emotional experiences: An integrated perspective and empirical test. In Advances in teacher emotion research (pp. 129-151). Springer, Boston, MA.‏
Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Daniels, L. M., Durksen, T. L., Becker-Kurz, B., & Klassen, R. M. (2016). Measuring teachers’ enjoyment, anger, and anxiety: The Teacher Emotions Scales (TES). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 148-163.‏
Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
Gooty, J., Connelly, S., Griffith, J., & Gupta, A. (2010). Leadership, affect and emotions: A state of the science review. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 979-1004.‏
Hall, N. C., & Goetz, T. (2013). Emotion, motivation, and self-regulation: A handbook for teachers. Emerald Group Publishing.‏
Hargreaves, A. (1997). Rethinking Educational Change with Heart and Mind. 1997 ASCD Yearbook.‏
Hargreaves, A. (2000). Mixed emotions: Teachers’ perceptions of their interactions with students. Teaching and teacher education, 16(8), 811-826.‏
Hong, J., Nie, Y., Heddy, B., Monobe, G., Ruan, J., You, S., & Kambara, H. (2016). Revising and validating achievement emotions questionnaire-teachers (AEQ-t). International Journal of Educational Psychology, 5(1), 80-107.‏
Hooman, H. A. (2005). Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL Application. Tehran: Samt Publishing. [Persian].
Hooman, H. A. (2014). Multivariate data analysis in scientific research. Tehran: Peike farhang Publishing. [Persian].
International Test Commission (2017) The ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests (Second edition). Available at: https://www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_test_adaptation_2ed.pdf.
James, C., & Connolly, U. (2000). Effective change in schools. Psychology Press.‏
James, C., Crawford, M., & Oplatka, I. (2018). An affective paradigm for educational leadership theory and practice: connecting affect, actions, power and influence. International Journal of Leadership in Education.‏
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (2014) Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington: American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education.
Karlsson, M. (2013). Emotional identification with teacher identities in student teachers’ narrative interaction. European Journal of Teacher Education, 36(2), 133-146.‏
Karshki, H. (2020). Linear structural relationships in humanitarian science research (Basics and Guidence use of LISREL software). Tehran: Avaye Noor Publishing. [Persian].
Karshki, H., Koohi, M., Ahani, Z. (2016). Validation of the Teacher Emotion Inventory from primary school in Mashhad. Quarterly of Educational Measurement, 6(24), 171-200. doi: 10.22054/jem.2017.12594.1359.
Keller, M. M., Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., & Hensley, L. (2014). Exploring teacher emotions. Teacher motivation: Theory and practice, 1, 70-82.‏
Kline, P. (2014). An easy guide to factor analysis. (Transleted by S. J. Sadrossadat, A. Minaei). Tehran: Samt Publishing. [Persian].
Koohi, M., Garavand, Y., Ghasemzadeh, A., Abbasi Josheghani, E. (2019). Evaluation of Psychometric Properties of Academic Emotions in teaching inventory. Quarterly of Educational Measurement, 9(35), 55-74. doi: 10.22054/jem.2019.36336.1835
Kreijns, K., Van Acker, F., Vermeulen, M., & Van Buuren, H. (2013). What stimulates teachers to integrate ICT in their pedagogical practices? The use of digital learning materials in education. Computers in human behavior, 29(1), 217-225.‏
Lasalvia, A. (2011). Occupational stress, professional burnout and job satisfaction among psychiatrists. Handbook of Stress in the Occupations. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 49-68.‏
Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Progress on a cognitive–motivational–relational theory of emotion. American Psychologist, 46, 819–834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.46. 8.819.
LeDoux, J. E. (1995). Emotion: Clues from the brain. Annual review of psychology, 46(1), 209-235.‏
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School leadership and management, 28(1), 27-42.‏
Li, S., Wu, J. G., Bian, J., Ding, Z., & Sun, Y. (2023). Understanding Digital Identity during the Pandemic: An Investigation of Two Chinese Spanish Teachers. Sustainability, 15(2), 1208.‏
Lingard, B., Martino, W., & Rezai-Rashti, G. (2013). Testing regimes, accountabilities and education policy: Commensurate global and national developments.‏
Mahfouz, J., Greenberg, M. & Rodriguez, A. (2019). Principals’ social and emotional competence: a key factor for creating caring schools. The Pennsylvania State University, October 2019.
Markland, D. (2006). Latent variable modeling: An introduction to confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling. University of Wales, Bangor.
Maroy, C. (2009). Convergences and hybridization of educational policies around ‘post‐bureaucratic’models of regulation. Compare, 39(1), 71-84.‏ doi:10.1080/03057920801903472
Maxwell, A., & Riley, P. (2017). Emotional demands, emotional labour and occupational outcomes in school principals: Modelling the relationships. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(3), 484-502.‏
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students' self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational psychologist, 37(2), 91-105.‏
Phillips, S., Sen, D., & McNamee, R. (2007). Prevalence and causes of self-reported work-related stress in head teachers. Occupational medicine, 57(5), 367-376.‏
‏Riley, P., & Langan-Fox, J. (2013). Bullying, stress and health in school principals and medical professionals: Experiences at the'front-line'.‏
‏Samier, E. A., Schmidt, M., & Blackmore, J. (2010). Preparing leaders to work with emotions in culturally diverse educational communities. Journal of educational administration.‏
Samier, E. A., Schmidt, M., & Blackmore, J. (2010). Preparing leaders to work with emotions in culturally diverse educational communities. Journal of Educational Administration.‏
Samier, E. A., Schmidt, M., & Schmidt, M. J. (2010). Is there a place for emotions within leadership preparation programmes?. Journal of Educational Administration.‏ doi: 10.1108/09578231011067776.
Saric, M. (2015). Teachers' emotions: research review from a psychological perspective. SODOBNA PEDAGOGIKA-JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL STUDIES, 66(4), 10-25.‏
Scherer, K. R., Wranik, T., Sangsue, J., Tran, V., & Scherer, U. (2004). Emotions in everyday life: Probability of occurrence, risk factors, appraisal and reaction patterns. Social Science Information, 43(4), 499-570.‏
Schutz, P. A., & Zembylas, M. (2009). Introduction to advances in teacher emotion research: The impact on teachers’ lives. In Advances in teacher emotion research (pp. 3-11). Springer, Boston, MA.‏
Schutz, P. A., Hong, J. Y., Cross, D. I., & Osbon, J. N. (2006). Reflections on investigating emotion in educational activity settings. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 343e360.
Shapiro, S. (2010). Revisiting the teachers’ lounge: Reflections on emotional experience and teacher identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 616e621.
Sun, J., & Leithwood, K. (2015). Leadership effects on student learning mediated by teacher emotions. Societies, 5(3), 566-582.‏
Sutton, R., & Wheatley, K. (2003). Teachers' emotions and teaching: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 15(4), 327-358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1026131715856
Ten Bruggencate, G., Luyten, H., Scheerens, J., & Sleegers, P. (2012). Modeling the influence of school leaders on student achievement: how can school leaders make a difference?. Educational administration quarterly, 48(4), 699-732.
Timoštšuk, I., & Ugaste, A. (2012). The role of emotions in student teachers’ professional identity. European Journal of Teacher Education, 35(4), 421-433.‏
Trigwell, K. (2012). Relations between teachers’ emotions in teaching and their approaches to teaching in higher education. Instructional Science, 40(3), 607-621.‏
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(6), 1063.
West, D. L., Peck, C., & Reitzug, U. C. (2010). Limited control and relentless accountability: Examining historical changes in urban school principal pressure. Journal of School Leadership, 20(2), 238-266.‏
Zembylas, M. (2003) Emotions and teacher identity: a post-structural perspective, Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 9, 213–238
Zembylas, M. (2007). Theory and methodology in researching emotions in education. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 30(1), 57-72.‏
Zembylas, M. (2016). The therapisation of social justice as an emotional regime: implications for critical education. Journal of Professional Capital and Community.‏
Zembylas, M. (2018). Professional standards for teachers and school leaders: Interrogating the entanglement of affect and biopower in standardizing processes. Journal of Professional Capital and Community.‏
Zikhali, J., & Perumal, J. (2016). Leading in disadvantaged Zimbabwean school contexts: Female school heads’ experiences of emotional labour. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(3), 347-362.