نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه روانشناسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.

2 استاد دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران.

3 استادیار گروه آموزشی روان شناسی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

4 دانشیار گروه آموزشی روان شناسی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف تبیین رفتار شاهدان قلدری بر اساس عدم درگیری اخلاقی و حساسیت اخلاقی با نقش واسطه‌ای همدلی انجام گرفت. طرح پژوهش توصیفی از نوع همبستگی با مدل معادله‌های ساختاری می‌باشد. جامعه مورد نظر دانش‌آموزان پسر و دختر متوسطه دوم استان لرستان در سال تحصیلی 98-97 بود. نمونه پژوهش حاضر شامل 617 دانش‌آموز بود که به روش نمونه‌گیری خوشه‌ای از چهار شهرستان خرم‌آباد، بروجرد، پلدختر و کوهدشت انتخاب شدند. شرکت‌کنندگان به مقیاس‌های مکانیسم‌های عدم درگیری اخلاقی (بندورا و همکاران، 1996)، حساسیت اخلاقی (ناروائز و اندیکات، 2009)، نقش شرکت‌کنندگان (رفتار شاهدان) (سالمیوالی و همکاران، 1996) و پرسشنامه همدلی اساسی (جولایف و فرینگتون، 2006). پاسخ دادند. نتایج نشان داد که مدل مفهومی پژوهش با داده‌های پژوهش برازش مطلوب و قابل قبولی دارد. داده‌های پژوهش با نرم افزار آموس 24 (AMOS) تحلیل شد. یافته‌های حاصل از مدل معادلات ساختاری نشان می‌دهدکه عدم درگیری اخلاقی و حساسیت اخلاقی با رفتار شاهدان در قلدری رابطه دارد. به عبارتی دیگر، کسانی که عدم درگیری اخلاقی بالا و حساسیت اخلاقی پایین دارند به صورت نامطلوب‌تری رفتار می‌کنند. همچنین نتایج تحلیل نشان می‌دهد که همدلی در ارتباط بین رفتارهای شاهدان قلدری در مدارس و عدم درگیری اخلاقی و حساسیت اخلاقی نقش واسطه-ای دارند. در مجموع به نظر می‌رسد که همدلی می‌توانند به عنوان واسطه یا مکانیزمی در رابطه بین عدم درگیری اخلاقی، حساسیت اخلاقی و رفتار شاهدان در هنگام قلدری منجر به پیامدهای مثبت بیشتر و پیامدهای منفی کمتر برای افراد شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Structural Equation Model of bystander’s behavior of bullying in school based on moral disengagement and moral sensitivity with the mediation role of empathy

نویسندگان [English]

  • hossein souri 1
  • parvin kadivar 2
  • hadi kramati 3
  • hamidreza hasanabadi 4

1 Department of Psychology, Payame Noor University, Tehran Iran

2 professor

3 Assistant Professor Kharazmi UniversityKharazmi University

4 Assistant Professor Kharazmi UniversityKharazmi University

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study is to designing the Structural Equation Model of bystander’s behavior of bullying in school based on moral disengagement and moral sensitivity with the mediation role of empathy. The target population of this study was male and female secondary school students in Lorestan province in the year of 2018-2019. The total of 617 students were selected through cluster sampling. Participants responded to the scale of Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement Scale (MMDS), Ethical Sensitivity Scale, Participant Role Scales and Self-Importance of Basic Empathy Scale (BES). The results showed that the research model with the research data was good fitness and acceptable. The results of structural equation modeling shows that moral disengagement and moral sensitivity associated with bystander’s behavior. In other words, those who have high moral disengagement and low moral sensitivity behave more harmfully. In addition, the results indicate that empathy have a mediator role in relation between bystander’s behavior of bullying in school, moral disengagement and moral sensitivity. n total, seems that empathy can serve as a mediator or mechanism in the relationship between moral disengagement, moral sensitivity, and bystander’s behavior of during bullying, resulting in more positive outcomes and fewer negative outcomes for individuals.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • bystander’s behavior
  • moral disengagement
  • moral sensitivity
  • empathy
  • bullying
  1. منابع

    جعفری، محمدعلی،. نوروزی، زهرا و فولادچنگ، محبوبه. (1396). بررسی ساختار عاملی، پایایی و روایی مقیاس همدلی اساسی: فرم فارسی. مطالعات روان‌شناسی تربیتی، 25، 38-23.

    سوری، حسین،. کدیور، پروین،. کرامتی، هادی و حسن‌آبادی، حمیدرضا. (1398). بررسی ساختار عاملی، پایایی و روایی نسخه فارسی مقیاس عدم درگیری اخلاقی. دوفصلنامه راهبردهای شناختی در یادگیری، 7(12)، 17-32.

    عظیم پور، علی‌رضا.، نیسی، عبدالکاظم.، شهنی ییلاق، منیجه.، ارشدی، نسرین و کیومرث، بشلیده. (1393). اعتباریابی مقیاس «اهمیت برای خویشتن هویت اخلاقی» برای دانشجویان. فصلنامه شخصیت و تفاوت‌های فردی، 3(4)، 38-19.

    غلامی، خلیل و ابراهیمی، ایران. (1394). طراحی مدل حساسیت اخلاقی و رابطۀ آن با تدریس مراقبتی معلمان. اخلاق در علوم و فنّاوری، 10(1)، 85-95.

    کاجی اصفهانی سعیده.، عارفی مژگان.، آقایی جشوقانی، اصغر.، اصلی آزاد، مسلم و فرهادی، طاهره. (1396). مطالعه همدلی شناختی در دانش آموزان با پرخاشگری ارتباطی و آشکار. فصلنامه سلامت روان کودک، ۴ (۲)، ۱۱۶-۱۲۴.

    References

    Albiero, P., Matricardi, G., Spelti, D., & Toso, D. (2009). The assessment of empathy in adolescence: A contribution to the Italian validation of the "Basic Empathy Scale". Journal of Adolescence, 32(2), 393-408.

    Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193–209. Doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3.

    Bandura, A. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31(2), 101–119, doi:10.1080/0305724022014322

    Bandura, A. (2016). Moral disengagement: How people do harm and live with themselves. Worth publishers.

    Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of personality and social psychology, 71(2), 364.

    Bellmore, A., Ma, T. L., You, J. I., & Hughes, M. (2012). A two-method investigation of early adolescents' responses upon witnessing peer victimization in school. Journal of Adolescence, 35(5), 1265-1276.

    Camodeca, M., & Goossens, F. A. (2005). Children's opinions on effective strategies to cope with bullying: The importance of bullying role and perspective. Educational research, 47(1), 93-105.

    Cappadocia, M. C., Pepler, D., Cummings, J. G., & Craig, W. (2012). Individual motivations and characteristics associated with bystander intervention during bullying episodes among children and youth. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 27(3), 201-216.

    Cheng, Y., Chiang, H. C., Ye, J., & Cheng, L. H. (2010). Enhancing empathy instruction using a collaborative virtual learning environment for children with autistic spectrum conditions. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1449-1458.

    Cole, J. C., Cornell, D. G., & Sheras, P. (2006). Identification of school bullies by survey methods. Professional School Counseling, 9(4), 305-313.

    Copeland, W. E., Wolke, D., Lereya, S. T., Shanahan, L., Worthman, C., & Costello, E. J. (2014). Childhood bullying involvement predicts low-grade systemic inflammation into adulthood. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(21), 7570-7575.

    Craig, W. M., Pepler, D., & Atlas, R. (2000). Observations of bullying in the playground and in the classroom. School Psychology International, 21(1), 22-36.

    DeSmet, A., Bastiaensens, S., Van Cleemput, K., Poels, K., Vandebosch, H., Deboutte, G., & De Troyer, O. (2018). The efficacy of the Friendly Attack serious digital game to promote prosocial bystander behavior in cyberbullying among young adolescents: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Computers in Human Behavior, 78(1), 336-347.

    Forsberg, C., Thornberg, R., & Samuelsson, M. (2014). Bystanders to bullying: Fourth-to seventh-grade students’ perspectives on their reactions. Research Papers in Education, 29(5), 557-576.

    Fowler, S. R., Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2009). Moral sensitivity in the context of socioscientific issues in high school science students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(2), 279-296.

    Gladden, R. M., Vivolo-Kantor, A. M., Hamburger, M. E., & Lumpkin, C. D. (2014). Bullying surveillance among youths: Uniform definitions for public health and recommended data elements, version 1.0. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and U.S. Department of Education.

    Hardy, S. A., Bean, D. S., & Olsen, J. A. (2015). Moral identity and adolescent prosocial and antisocial behaviors: Interactions with moral disengagement and self-regulation. Journal of youth and adolescence, 44(8), 1542-1554.

    Hyatt, J. (2017). Recognizing moral disengagement and its impact on patient safety. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 7(4), 15-21.

    Ibanez, A., Huepe, D., Gempp, R., Gutiérrez, V., Rivera-Rei, A., & Toledo, M. I. (2013). Empathy, sex and fluid intelligence as predictors of theory of mind. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(5), 616-621.

    Jenkins, L. N., Fredrick, S. S., & Nickerson, A. (2018). The assessment of bystander intervention in bullying: Examining measurement invariance across gender. Journal of School Psychology, 69(3), 73-83.

    Jimerson, S. R., Swearer, S. M., & Espelage, D. L. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective. Routledge.

    Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Development and validation of the Basic Empathy Scale. Journal of adolescence, 29(4), 589-611.

    Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Is low empathy related to bullying after controlling for individual and social background variables?. Journal of Adolescence, 34(1), 59-71.

    Kiriakidis, S. P. (2008). Moral disengagement: Relation to delinquency and independence from indices of social dysfunction. International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology, 52(5), 571-583.

    Kuusisto, E., Tirri, K., & Rissanen, I. (2012). Finnish teachers’ ethical sensitivity. Education Research International, 2012. doi:10.1155/2012/351879. Special Issue

    Luo, A., & Bussey, K. (2019). The selectivity of moral disengagement in defenders of cyberbullying: Contextual moral disengagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 93(4), 318-325.

    M.A. Jafari., Z. Nooroozi, M. Foolad Chang, (2017). The study of factor structure, reliability and validity of basic empathy scale: Persian form, Journal of Educational Psychology Studies, 14(25), 23-38. [In Persian]

    Maunder, R. E., & Crafter, S. (2018). School bullying from a sociocultural perspective. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 38(1), 13-20.

    Mueller, R. O. (1996). Confirmatory factor analysis. In Basic Principles of Structural Equation Modeling (pp. 62-128). Springer, New York, NY

    Narvaez D. (2001). Ethical sensitivity. Available at: http://www.nd.edu/~dnarvaez/. Accessed: 12 Jun 2013.

    Narvaez, D., & Endicott, L. (2009). Nurturing character in the classroom, EthEx Series, Book 1: Ethical sensitivity. Notre Dame, IN: ACE Press.

    Nokelainen, P., & Tirri, K. (2010). Role of motivation in the moral and religious judgment of mathematically gifted adolescents. High Ability Studies, 21(2), 101-116.

    Obermann, M. L. (2011). Moral disengagement among bystanders to school bullying. Journal of School Violence, 10(3), 239-257.

    Oliveira, F. R., de Menezes, T. A., Irffi, G., & Oliveira, G. R. (2018). Bullying effect on student’s performance. EconomiA, 19(1), 57-73.

    Ouvrein, G., De Backer, C. J., & Vandebosch, H. (2018). Online celebrity aggression: A combination of low empathy and high moral disengagement? The relationship between empathy and moral disengagement and adolescents' online celebrity aggression. Computers in Human Behavior, 89(12), 61-69.

    Ouvrein, G., Vandebosch, H., & De Backer, C. J. (2017). Celebrity critiquing: hot or not? Teen girls’ attitudes on and responses to the practice of negative celebrity critiquing. Celebrity Studies, 8(3), 461-476.

    Paciello, M., Fida, R., Tramontano, C., Cole, E., & Cerniglia, L. (2013). Moral dilemma in adolescence: The role of values, prosocial moral reasoning and moral disengagement in helping decision making. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10(2), 190-205.

    Pelton, J., Gound, M., Forehand, R., & Brody, G. (2004). The moral disengagement scale: Extension with an American minority sample. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26(1), 31-39.

    Pepler, D. J., & Craig, W. M. (1995). A peek behind the fence: Naturalistic observations of aggressive children with remote audiovisual recording. Developmental Psychology, 31(4), 548.

    Perren, S., Gutzwiller‐Helfenfinger, E., Malti, T., & Hymel, S. (2012). Moral reasoning and emotion attributions of adolescent bullies, victims, and bully‐victims. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30(4), 511-530.

    Pozzoli, T., Ang, R. P., & Gini, G. (2012). Bystanders' reactions to bullying: A cross‐cultural analysis of personal correlates among Italian and Singaporean students. Social Development, 21(4), 686-703.

    Reynolds, S. J., & Miller, J. A. (2015). The recognition of moral issues: Moral awareness, moral sensitivity and moral attentiveness. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6(6), 114-117.

    Rieffe, C., Ketelaar, L., & Wiefferink, C. H. (2010). Assessing empathy in young children: Construction and validation of an Empathy Questionnaire (EmQue). Personality and individual differences, 49(5), 362-367.

    Salmivalli, C. (1999). Participant role approach to school bullying: Implications for interventions. Journal of adolescence, 22(4), 453-459.

    Sekol, I., & Farrington, D. P. (2010). The overlap between bullying and victimization in adolescent residential care: Are bully/victims a special category?. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(12), 1758-1769.

    Smith, P. K., Nika, V., & Papasideri, M. (2004). Bullying and violence in schools: An international perspective and findings in Greece. Psychology, 11(2), 184-203.

    Song, J., & Oh, I. (2018). Factors influencing bystanders' behavioral reactions in cyberbullying situations. Computers in Human Behavior, 78(1), 273-282.

    Stoeber, J., & Yang, H. (2016). Moral perfectionism and moral values, virtues, and judgments: Further investigations. Personality and Individual Differences, 88(1), 6-11.

    Sutton, J., & Smith, P. K. (1999). Bullying as a group process: An adaptation of the participant role approach. Aggressive behavior, 25(2), 97-111.

    Szabó, C., Németh, A., & Kéri, S. (2013). Ethical sensitivity in obsessive-compulsive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder: The role of reversal learning. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry, 44(4), 404-410.

    Thornberg, R., & Jungert, T. (2013). Bystander behavior in bullying situations: Basic moral sensitivity, moral disengagement and defender self-efficacy. Journal of adolescence, 36(3), 475-483.

    Thornberg, R., Tenenbaum, L., Varjas, K., Meyers, J., Jungert, T., & Vanegas, G. (2012). Bystander motivation in bullying incidents: To intervene or not to intervene?. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 13(3), 247.

    Tongsuebsai, K., Sujiva, S., & Lawthong, N. (2015). Development and construct validity of the moral sensitivity scale in Thai version. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191(27), 718-722.

    Turner, R. M. (2008). Moral disengagement as a predictor of bullying and aggression: Are there gender differences? The University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

    Van Lissa, C. J., Hawk, S. T., & Meeus, W. H. (2017). The effects of affective and cognitive empathy on adolescents’ behavior and outcomes in conflicts with mothers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 158(6), 32-45.

    Wang, C., Ryoo, J. H., Swearer, S. M., Turner, R., & Goldberg, T. S. (2017a). Longitudinal relationships between bullying and moral disengagement among adolescents. Journal of youth and adolescence, 46(6), 1304-1317.

    Wang, X., Lei, L., Yang, J., Gao, L., & Zhao, F. (2017b). Moral disengagement as mediator and moderator of the relation between empathy and aggression among Chinese male juvenile delinquents. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 48(2), 316-326.

    Weaver, K. (2007). Ethical sensitivity: state of knowledge and needs for further research. Nursing ethics, 14(2), 141-155.

    Whittaker, E., & Kowalski, R. M. (2015). Cyberbullying via social media. Journal of School Violence, 14(1), 11-29.

    Zelidman, A. (2014). Empathy as a moderator of adolescent bullying behavior and moral disengagement after controlling for social desirability. Dissertation for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Wayne State University.

    In Persian

    Azimpour, A. R., Naisi, A. K. Shahni Yaelagh, Arshadi, M. N. K. Beshlideh, (2014). Validation the Measure of " the Self-importance of Moral Identity" on University Students, personality and individual differences, 3(4), 19.

    Gholami, K., & Tirri, K. (2012). Caring teaching as a moral practice: An exploratory study on perceived dimensions of caring teaching. Education Research International, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/954274, Special Issue

    Gholami, K. & Ebrahimi, I. (2015). Providing and Fitting an Ethical Sensitivity Model and Its Relationship with Caring Teaching, Journal of Ethics in Scince and Technology, 10(1), 85.

    1. Souri., P. Kadivar., H. Keramati., H.R. Hassanabadi, (2019). The Study of Factor Structure, Reliability and Validity of Persian Version of the Moral Disengagement Scale, Biquarterly Journal of Cognitive Strategies in Learning, 7(12), 17-32.
    2. Kaji Isfahani., M. Arefi., A. Aqaei Joshaghani., M. Asli Azad., T. Farhadi, (2017). Cognitive Empathy in Students with Relational and Explicit Aggression, Quarterly Journal of Child Mental Health, 4(2), 116.