نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه آموزشی علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران.

2 استاد گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران.

3 کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران.

چکیده

هدف این پژوهش، طراحی و اعتبارسنجی مقیاس سنجش کیفیت آموزش مجازی اساتید از نظر دانشجویان بود. این پژوهش از نظر هدف، کاربردی و از نظر نحوۀ گردآوری داده‌ها، توصیفی و از نوع همبستگی است. جامعه آماری این پژوهش، کلیه دانشجویان دانشگاه بوعلی سینا همدان که در ارزیابی اساتید شرکت نموده اند، بود حجم نمونه آماری شامل 500 نفر بود که به شیوه نمونه گیری تصادفی نسبتی انتخاب شدند. الگوی کیفیت آموزش مجازی 15 سؤالی در پنج بعد راهبردهای آموزشی، محتوای آموزشی، فعالیتهای ارزیابی، تعامل و پاسخگویی و اثربخشی طراحی شد؛ سپس با استفاده از تکنیکهای آماری نسبت روایی محتوا و تحلیل عاملی تأییدی، روایی ابزار، بررسی و درنهایت با روش آلفای کرانباخ، پایایی ابزار تعیین شد. نتایج نشان داد ساختار الگوی کیفیت آموزش مجازی با توجه به نسبت روایی محتوا (76/0)و تحلیل عاملی تأییدی که مقدار شاخص نیکویی برازش(GFI) برابر با 967/0 شاخص برازندگی تطبیقی (CFI) برابر با 994/0 و شاخص تعدیل یافته برازندگی (AFGI) برابر با 924/0 و ریشه میانگین مربعات خطای برآورد(RMSEA) برابر با 052/0 تأیید شد. همچنین ابزار دارای پایایی مناسب و مطلوب با مقادیر آلفای کرانباخ کل (988/0)، بود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Design and validation of a scale for measuring the quality of e-learning of university professors from the students' point of view

نویسندگان [English]

  • Afshin Afzali 1
  • Mohamadreza yousefzade choosari 2
  • Rooholah Azimi 3

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Bu Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran.

2 Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Bu Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran.

3 Master of Information Technology Management, Bu Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran.

چکیده [English]

The present study was conducted with the aim of designing and validating a scale for measuring the quality of virtual education of professors from the students' point of view. This research is an applied research in descriptive-correlative manner. The statistical population of this study was all students of Bu Ali Sina University of Hamadan who participated in the evaluation of professors. The statistical sample size was 500 people who were selected by relative random sampling. The 15-item e-learning quality model was designed in five dimensions: educational strategies, educational content, evaluation activities, interaction and responsiveness, and effectiveness; Then, using statistical techniques of content validity ratio and confirmatory factor analysis, tool validity was reviewed and Finally, Cronbach's alpha method was used to determine the reliability of the tool. The results showed that the structure of e-learning quality model according to the content validity ratio (0.76) and confirmatory factor analysis that the value of goodness-of-fit index (GFI) is equal to 0.967, comparative fit index (CFI) is equal to 0.994 and adjustmented goodness-of-fit index (AFGI) equal to 0.924 and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) equal to 0.052 was confirmed. The instrument also had good reliability with total Cronbach's alpha values (0.988).

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • E-learning
  • quality assessment
  • design
  • validation
 
References
Al-Fraihatm, D., loy, M. & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study, computers in human behavior, 102:67-86  doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004
Alkahtani, A. (2017). The challenges facing the integration of ICT in teaching in Saudi secondary schools. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, (IJEDICT), 13(1), 32-51
Bagarukayo, E. & Kalema, B. (2015). Evaluation of e learning usage in South African universities: A critical review. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 11(2):120-130
Chang, J. H., Chiu, P. S., & Huang, Y. M. (2018). A Sharing Mind Map-oriented Approach to Enhance Collaborative Mobile Learning With Digital Archiving Systems. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1), 1-24.
Downes, S. (2012). Connectivism and Connective Knowledge. Essays on meaning and learning networks. UPAEP
Gramatakos, A., & Lavau, S. (2019). Informal learning for sustainability in higher education institutions. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20(2), 378–392
Hadullo, K., Oboko, R., Omwenga, E. (2017). A model for evaluating e-learning systems quality in higher education in developing countries. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 13 (2): 185-204
Hang, H. T. & Yuen, S. C. Y. (2010). Educational use of social networking technology in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(6), 703-714.
Lee, J. K., & Lee, W. K. (2018). The relationship of e-learners self-regulatory efficacy and perception of e-learning environmental quality. Computer in human behavior, 24(1), 32-47.
McKnight, K., O'Malley, K., Ruzic, R., Horsley, M. K., Franey, J. J., & Bassett, K. (2016). Teaching in a digital age: How educators use technology to improve student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(3), 194-211.
Nichols, G. W. (1997). Formative Evaluation of Web based Instruction, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications: 374-369
Oliver, R. (2002). The role of ICT in higher education for the 21 century: ICT as a change agent for education. Australia: Cowan University.
Ozkan, S. & Koseler, R. (2009). Multi-dimensional students’ evaluation of e-learning systems in the higher education context: An empirical investigation. Computers & Education. 53(4): 1285–1296.
Petrova, A. A., Doroyhee, M. & Petrov, A. (2019). Meta-model of the teaching and learning environment based on ICT integration in the e-learning systems, Bulgarian, Sofa National Science Fund
Anari Nejad, Abbas and Mohammadi, Mehdi (2014). Practical indicators of e-learning evaluation in Iranian higher education. University E-Learning Quarterly 5 (1), 25-11.[in persian]
Bagheri Dehnavi, Maliha; Rezaei Noor, Jalal and Hani, Seyed Hassan (2012). Presenting a conceptual model for evaluating e-commerce of government organizations by Delphi method. The second national conference and software engineering of Lahijan, Islamic Azad University, Lahijan branch.[in persian]
Turkzadeh, Jafar; Marzooqi, Rahmatullah; Mohammadi, Mehdi; Salimi, Qasim; Agriculture, Fahimeh (2015). Develop a framework for evaluating the effectiveness of higher education curricula based on a strategic approach. Journal of Curriculum Research, 6 (2), 41-64. .[in persian]
Hamzeh Beigi, Tayebeh (2004). Curriculum in the age of information and communication technology. Tehran: Ayizh Publications. .[in persian]
Khan, Badrol H. (1958). E-learning management. Translated by Emad Ghaeni, Babak, Abdolhaq, (1390). Tehran, Industrial Management Organization.[in persian]
Khatib Zanjani, Nazila; Zandi, Bahman; Farajollahi, Mehran; Sarmadi, Mohammad Reza and Ebrahimzadeh, Issa. (2009). Structured analysis of the requirements and challenges in e-learning and design of a practical model for the successful implementation of e-courses in medical education. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 11 (8), 1009-995. .[in persian]
Kheirandish, Mahdi . (2011). Feasibility study model for implementing virtual trainings. Journal of Education Strategies in Medical Sciences, 4 (3), 142-137. .[in persian]
Daneshvar, Mitra. (2010). group learning. Interdisciplinary Quarterly of Virtual Education in Medical Sciences, 1 (3), 11-1. .[in persian]
Rabiee, Mehdi; Mohebbi, Amin and Rashid Haji Lou, Saleh. (2010). Evaluation of the internal quality of the virtual curriculum of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. Medical Education Development Horizon Quarterly, 4 (1), 36-29. .[in persian]
Zamani, Bibi Ishrat. (2005) Teaching and learning information technology skills in the curriculum. Book Quarterly, 61: 173-184.[in persian]
Sakti, Parviz; Anari Nejad, Abbas and Safavid, Ali Akbar. (2009) Designing a conceptual framework for evaluating e-learning programs in Iranian higher education institutions. Journal of Education Technology, 4 (3), 201-191. .[in persian]
Document of fundamental transformation of education. (2011) Tehran: Secretariat of the Higher Education Council .[in persian]
Abdoli, Samaneh and Mohammad Hassani, Nasrin. (2015) Synthesis research of components, tools and methods used in the evaluation of e-learning and the will of a comprehensive model for the evaluation of e-learning. Journal of Educational Measurement and Evaluation Studies, 5 (9): 172-153.[in persian]
Faizi, Kamran and Behzadi, Abdullah. (2013) Presenting a model to assess the readiness of e-learning systems in organizations and financial institutions. Education Technology 8 (3): 204-193.[in persian]
Kurdish Zanganeh, Azadeh; Saber, Umm al-Bani; Saberi, Maryam (2013) A study of the quality of graduate education from the perspective of graduate students at Shiraz University. Iranian Higher Education Association Quarterly, 6 (1), 157-180.[in persian]
Najjari, Mehdi; Hedayatzadeh, Seyed Hesam; Roshani, Hassan; Mokhtarian, Frank. (2017) Identifying the factors affecting the level of customer satisfaction in graduate education in the higher education system using the Kano model. Higher Education Quarterly, 10 (40), 51-73. .[in persian]
Noorollahi, Saeed., Hakimzadeh., Rezvan., And Seraji, Farhad. (2012) Evaluating the quality of educational design of electronic courses of the Virtual Faculty of Hadith Sciences. Higher Education Quarterly, 5 (17), 117-135.[in persian]