شاطریان محمدی، فاطمه. (1382). مقایسه سه روش همتراز سازی همصدک هموار نشده نمره مشاهده شدهIRT و نمره واقعیIRT در طرح گروه های نامعادل با سوالات لنکر (پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد). دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی. دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی. تهران.
مقدم زاده، علی. (1391). روش بهینه همترازسازی با توجه به ویژگی های بومی آزمونهای ملی ایران: مورد مطالعه آزمون تولیمو و آزمونهای جامع کنکورهای آزمایشی سازمان سنجش آموزش کشور (رساله دکترا). دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی. دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی. تهران.
واشقانی فراهانی، مریم. (1380). کاربرد روش همتراز سازی همصدک در معادل سازی نمرات آزمون های ورودی دانشگاهها (کنکور ورودی سال 1387) (پایان نامه ارشناسی ارشد). دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی. دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران.
Ackerman, T. A., Gierl, M. J., & Walker, C. M. (2003). Using multidimensional item response theory to evaluate educational and psychological tests. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(3), 37-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2003.tb00136.x
Andrews, B. J. (2011). Assessing first-and second-order equity for the common-item nonequivalent groups design using multidimensional IRT [Doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa].
Arıkan, Ç. A., & Gelbal, S. (2018). A Comparison of Traditional and Kernel Equating Methods. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 5(3), 417-427. DOI:10.21449/ijate.409826
Brossman, B. G. (2010).Observed score and true score equating procedures for multidimensional item response theory [Doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa].
Brossman, B. G., & Lee, W. C. (2013). Observed score and true score equating procedures for multidimensional item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37(6), 460-481. DOI:10.1177/0146621613484083
Camilli, G., Wang, M. M., & Fesq, J. (1995). The effects of dimensionality on equating the Law School Admission Test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 32(1), 79-96.
Champlain, A. F. (1996). The Effect of Multidimensionality on IRT True‐Score Equating for Subgroups of Examinees. Journal of Educational Measurement, 33(2), 181-201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1996.tb00488.x
Chen, H. (2012). A Comparison Between Linear IRT Observed‐Score Equating and Levine Observed‐Score Equating Under the Generalized Kernel Equating Framework. Journal of Educational Measurement, 49(3), 269-284. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2012.00175.x
Chen, J. (2014). Model selection for IRT equating of testlet-based tests in the random groups design [Doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa].
Cook, L. L., Dorans, N. J., Eignor, D. R., & Petersen, N. S. (1985). An Assessment of the Relationship Between the Assumption of Unidimensionality and the Quality of IRT True-Score Equating 1, 2, 3. ETS Research Report Series, 1985(2), i-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2330-8516.1985.tb00115.x
Dorans, N. J., & Kingston, N. M. (1985). The effects of violations of unidimensionality on the estimation of item and ability parameters and on item response theory equating of the GRE verbal scale. Journal of Educational Measurement, 22(4), 249-262. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1985.tb01062.x
Dorans, N.J. & Holland, P.W. (2000). Population invariance and equitability of tests: Basic theory and the linear case. Journal of Educational Measurement, 37, 281–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2000.tb01088.x
González, J., & Wiberg, M. (2017). Applying test equating methods. New York: Springer. doi, 10, 978-3.
Han, T., Kolen, M., & Pohlmann, J. (1997). A comparison among IRT true-and observed-score equatings and traditional equipercentile equating. Applied Measurement in Education, 10(2), 105-121. DOI: 10.1207/s15324818ame1002_1
Hanson, B., & Zeng, L. (2004). PIE: A computer program for IRT equating. (Windows Console Version, Revised by Z. Cui, May 20, 2004) [Manual]. Unpublished manuscript, College of Education, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Hirsch, T. M. (1989). Multidimensional equating. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26(4), 337-349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1989.tb00338.x
Kim, K. Y., Lim, E., & Lee, W. C. (2019). A Comparison of the Relative Performance of Four IRT Models on Equating Passage-Based Tests. International Journal of Testing, 19(3), 248-269. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2018.1530239
Kim, S. Y. (2018). Simple structure MIRT equating for multidimensional tests [Doctoral dissertation, University of Lowa].
Kim, S., Cole, K. L., & Mwavita, M. (2018). FIPC Linking Across Multidimensional Test Forms: Effects of Confounding Difficulty within Dimensions. International Journal of Testing, 18(4), 323-345. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJQRE.2019.100168
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, (3rd Ed). New York, NY: Guilford.
Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (2004). Test equating, scaling, and linking. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Lee, E, Lee, W.C., Brennan, R. L. (2014). Equating Multidimensional Tests under a Random Groups Design: A Comparison of Various Equating Procedures, Center for Advanced Studies in Measurement and Assessment, CASMA Research Report.
Li, Y. H., & Lissitz, R. W. (2000). An evaluation of the accuracy of multidimensional IRT linking. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24(2), 115-138. https://doi.org/10.1177/01466216000242002
Li, Y., Jiao, H., & Lissitz, R. W. (2012). Applying multidimensional item response theory models in validating test dimensionality: An example of K–12 large-scale science assessment. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 13(2).
Lim, E. (2016). Subscore equating with the random groups design [Doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa].
Lim, E; Lee, w. c. (2016). Subscore Equating and Reporting. Center for Advanced Studies in Measurement and Assessment, CASMA Research Report.
Lu, R., & Guo, H. (2018). A Simulation Study to Compare Nonequivalent Groups With Anchor Test Equating and Pseudo-Equivalent Group Linking. ETS Research Report Series, 2018(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12196
Meng, Y. (2012). Comparison of Kernel Equating and Item Response Theory Equating Methods. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, PO Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106.
Moghadamzadeh, A. (2013). Optimal Smoothing Method of Data in Test Equating: The Case of TOLIMO and Comprehensive Trial Tests of Iran Educational Testing Organization. [Doctoral Dissertation, Allameh Tabataba'i University]. [In Persian]
Oshima, T. C., Davey, T. C., & Lee, K. (2000). Multidimensional linking: Four practical approaches. Journal of Educational Measurement, 37, 357-373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2000.tb01092.x
Peterson, J. L. (2014). Multidimensional item response theory observed score equating methods for mixed-format tests [Doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa].
Ricker, K. L. (2007). The Consequence of Multidimensionality IRT Equating Outcomes Using a Common-Items Nonequivalent Groups Design [Doctoral dissertation, university of Alberta].
Rizopoulos, D. (2006). ltm: An R package for latent variable modeling and item response theory analyses. Journal of statistical software, 17(5), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v017.i05
Rizvanifar, Shirin. (2012). Equating of the scores of mathematics and physics courses in the field of experimental sciences in the national entrance exams based on classical and new measurement theories. [Master Dissertation, Allameh Tabataba'i University]. [In Persian]
Seo, D. G., & Weiss, D. J. (2015). Best design for multidimensional computerized adaptive testing with the bifactor model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75(6), 954-978. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164415575147
Shaterian Mohammadi, F. Comparison of three unsmoothed percentile equating of the observed and True score IRT methods in unequal group design with anchor questions. [Master Dissertation, Allameh Tabataba'i University]. [In Persian]
Shin, M. (2015). An Investigation of Subtest Score Equating Methods under Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory Frameworks [Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts].
Simon, M. K. (2008). Comparison of concurrent and separate multidimensional IRT linking of item parameters [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Minnesota].
Spence, P. D. (1996). The effect of multidimensionality on unidimensional equating with item response theory [Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida].
Topczewski, A. M. (2013). Effect of violating unidimensional item response theory vertical scaling assumptions on developmental score scales [Doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa].
Vashghani Farahani, M. (2010). The application of the equipercentile method in equating university entrance exam scores (2017 entrance exam). [Master Dissertation, Allameh Tabataba'i University]. [In Persian]
Zhang, B., Stone, C. A. (2008). Evaluating Item Fit for Multidimensional Item Response Models, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(2), 181-196. DOI:10.1177/0013164407301547
Zhang, O. (2012). Observed score and true score equating for multidimensional item response theory under nonequivalent group anchor test design [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Florida].
)