Applying and Methodological Considerations of Organizational Pulse Surveys

Younesi, Jalil

doi:10.22054/jem.2023.73672.3463

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Jalil Younesi

Associate Professor, Measurement and Measurement Dept., Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22054/jem.2023.73672.3463

Abstract

To keep up with increasing organizational complexities, the best survey and survey practices have evolved. This is evidenced by the continuous listening strategy, which entails conducting surveys and developing plans more frequently than in a single static event, such as biennial, annual, or short period surveys to provide consistent feedback, data, and insights. The flow of the continuous listening in organizations has steered the focus of psychometric specialists towards the continuous survey or pulse survey model. The objective of this research was to study the current and future status of employee surveys in organizations in Iran, including public and private entities, from the perspective of their Human Resources specialists. For this purpose, a survey was conducted for two months between July and September of 2022. The study targeted organizations in Iran that conducted official activities during 2022. The purposeful stratified sampling method was applied to collect data from organizations and companies of varying sizes & industry sectors. The findings demonstrate that advancements in all facets of the Pulse Survey Cycle, from design to reporting and analysis to providing more timely and relevant data, have motivated organizations to move away from traditional surveying strategies and align with the advancements of newer technologies through Pulse Surveys. Despite the slow evolution of surveys among Iranian organizations and companies, it is evident that they are making gradual advancements, which align with the progress of scientific resources and popular media coverage.

Keywords

References

تیلور، کاترین، اس. (2013). روایی و رواسازی. ترجمه یونسی، جلیل (1398). تهران: دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی.

دلاور، علی. (1395). طرح‌های آزمایشی در روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی. تهران: سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی دانشگاه‌ها (سمت).

دلاور، علی. (1391). مقیاس‌های سنجش نگرش. نشر روان.

دلاور، علی. (1395). مبانی نظری و عملی پژوهش در علوم انسانی و اجتماعی. تهران: رشد.

Allen, J. B., Jain, S., & Church, A. H. (2020). Using a pulse survey approach to drive organizational change. Organ. Dev. Rev, 52, 62-68.

Beagrie, S. (2015). Next generation employee engagement tools. HR Magazine.

Bersin, J. (2014). It's time to rethink the'employee engagement'issue. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www. forbes. com/sites/joshbersin/2014/04/10/its-time-torethink-the-employee-engagement-issue.

Brown, M. I. (2022). Investigating the promise and pitfalls of pulse surveys. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 15(1), 137-149.

Brown, S., Liyanage, S., Mikrou, P., Singh, A., & Ewer, A. K. (2020). Newborn pulse oximetry screening in the UK: a 2020 survey. The Lancet, 396(10255), 881.

Chiu, M. (2016). What HR needs to know about sentiment analysis. CEB Talent Daily. Retrieved from https://www.cebglobal.com/talentdaily/ hr-needs-to-know-sentiment-analysis/

Church, A. H., Kuyumcu, D., & Rotolo, C. T. (2016). Survey feedback: Driving change through organizational surveys. Oxford Bibliographies in Management. Retrieved from http:// www.oxfordbibliographies.com/ view/ document/ obo- 9780199846740/ obo- 9780199846740- 0089.xml

Colihan, J., Waclawski, J., & Kraut, A. (2006). Pulse surveys: A limited approach with some unique advantages. Getting action from organizational surveys: New concepts, technologies, and applications, 264-293.

Deloitte. (2017). Rewriting the rules for the digital age. Deloitte Global Human Capital Trends. Retrieved from https:// www2.deloitte.com/ us/ en/ pages/ human- capital/ articles/introduction- human- capital- trends.html

Dewhurst, S. (2006). Key findings from the pulse survey. Strategic Communication Management, 11(1), 6.

Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H. M. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. Journal of marketing research, 38(2), 269-277.

Diaz, J. B. B., & Young, S. F. (2022). The future is here: A benchmark study of digitally enabled assessment and development tools. Consulting Psychology Journal, 74(1), 40–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/cpb0000201

Edwards, J. R., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures. Psychological methods, 5(2), 155.

Jolton, J., Tate, R., & Shah, N. (2017). Evolving and engaging work experience: building foundations and creating distinction.

Jolton, J., Barnett, G., Fink, A., Mastrangelo, P., & Weiner, S. (2017). Breaking from the norm: Argument for new survey best practices. Alternative session format at the 32nd Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL.

Kraut, A. I. (Ed.). (1996). Organizational surveys: Tools for assessment and change (Vol. 3). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.

Kraut, A. I. (Ed.). (2006). Getting action from organizational surveys: New concepts, technologies, and applications. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.

Levenson, A. (2014). Employee surveys that work: Improving design, use, and organizational impact. San Francisco, CA: Berrett- Koehler.

Levenson, A. (2014). Employee surveys that work: Improving design, use, and organizational impact. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Mastrangelo, P. M., Macey, W. H., & Fink, A. A. (2020). Improving the design and interpretation of sample surveys in the workplace. Employee surveys and sensing: Challenges and opportunities, 38-52.

Masztal, J. J., Salamon, D. M., Pashturro, G., & Steelman, L. (2015). Employees can make the difference! examining the employee survey process in fortune 500 and mid-sized companies.

Nadler, D. A. (1977). Feedback and organization development: using databased methods. Boston, MA: Addison- Wesley Longman.

Paul, K. B., & Bracken, D. W. (1995). Everything you always wanted to know about employee surveys. Training & Development, 49(1), 45–49.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879.

Porter, S. R., Whitcomb, M. E., & Weitzer, W. H. (2004). Multiple surveys of students and survey fatigue. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2004(121), 63– 73.

Ray, R., Hyland, P. K., Dye, D., Kaplan, J., & Pressman, A. (2013). The DNA of engagement. Retrieved from https://www.conference-board.org/councils/councildetail. cfm?councilid=1058.

Rotolo, C. T., & Church, A. H. (2015). Big Data Recommendations for Industrial–Organizational Psychology: Are We in Whoville?. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8(4), 515-520.

Rowh, M. (2011). How to find out what employees really think. CIO. Retrieved from https://www.cio.com/article/2402428/enterprise-software/how-to find-out-what-employees-really-think

Weiner, S. P., & Dalessio, A. T. (2006). Oversurveying: Causes, consequences, and cures. Getting action from organizational surveys: New concepts, methods, and applications, 294-311.

Welbourne, T. M. (2016). The potential of pulse surveys: Transforming surveys into leadership tools. Employment Relations Today, 43(1), 33-39.

Quarterly of Educational Measurement

Applying and Methodological Considerations of Organizational Pulse Surveys

References

References

Volume 14, Issue 52
July 2023
Pages 6-40

Applying and Methodological Considerations of Organizational Pulse Surveys

References

References

Volume 14, Issue 52July 2023Pages 6-40

Volume 14, Issue 52
July 2023
Pages 6-40