-گرامی پور، مسعود (1393). ارزیابی توان آماری تحلیل رگرسیون لجستیک در آشکارسازی کنش افتراقی سؤالهای آزمون، فصلنامه مطالعات اندازهگیری و ارزشیابی آموزشی، سال چهارم، شماره 8، 187-211. بازیابی از:
- همبلتون، رونالد ک؛ سؤامیناتان، اچ؛ راجرز، اچ. جین (1991). مبانی نظریه پرسش- پاسخ. ترجمه محمدرضا فلسفی نژاد (1389). تهران: دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی.
References
- Aryadoust, Vahid.(2018). Using recursive partitioning Rasch trees to investigate differential item functioning in second language reading tests. Studies in Educational Evaluation 56. 197–204.
-Benjamini, Y. Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing, Journal of the Royal Statiatical Socirty, Series B(Methodological), Vol.57, No. 1, 289-300.
- Camilli, G. (2006). Test fairness. In R. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 221-256). New York: American Council on Education & Praeger series on higher education.
-Elder, C.; Mc Namara, T. & Congdon, P. (2003). Rasch techniques for detecting bias in performance tests: An example comparing the performance of native and non-native speakers on a test of academic English. Journal of Applied Measurement, 4: 181–197.
- Ellis, B. B. & Raju, N. S. (2003). Test and item bias: What they are, what they aren’t, and how to detect them. Educational Resources information center (ERIC).
-Engelhard, G. Hansche, L. & Rutledge, K. (1990). Accuracy of bias review judges in identifying differential item functioning on teacher certification tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 3, 347–360
- Fischer G, Molenaar I (eds.) (1995). Rasch Models: Foundations, Recent Developments and Applications. Springer-Verlag, New York.
- Geramipour, Masoud (2020). Item-Focused Trees Approach in Differential Item Functioning (DIF) Analysis: A Case Study of an EFL Reading Comprehension Test, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2020,123-147.
- Hambleton, R, K. Swaminathan, H. & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publictions.
- Hidalgo, M. D. & López-Pina, J. P. (2004). Differential item functioning detection and effect size: A comparison between logistic regression and Mantel Haenszel procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64: 903–915.
- Liou M (1994). More on the Computation of Higher-Order Derivatives on the Elementary Symmetric Functions in the Rasch Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18(1), 53–62.
- Liu, Yanlou. Yin, Hao. Xin, Tao. Shao, Laicheng. Yuan, Lu (2019). A Comparison of Differential Item Functioning Detection Methods in Cognitive Diagnostic Models, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01137.
- Merkle EC, Zeileis A (2013). Tests of Measurement Invariance without Subgroups: A Generalization of Classical Methods. Psychometrika, 78(1), 59–82.
- Millsap, R. E. (2012). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. New York, NY: Routledge
- Moritz, B.(2020). Item Focussed recursive Partitioning for Simulataneous Selection of items and variables that induce Differential Item Functioning(DIF) in dichotomous or Polytomous items.
- Popham,W.J (2005). High-Stakes Tests: Harmful, Permanent, Fixable. American Educational Research Journal.6,p85.
- Strobl, Carolin. Kopf, Julia. Zeileis, Achim (2015). Rasch Trees: A New Method for Detecting Differential Item Functioning in the Rasch Model, Working Papers in Economics and Statistics.
- Tutz, G., & Berger, M. (2016). Item-focussed trees for the identification of items in differential item functioning. Psychometrika, 81, 727-750.
-Yüksel, Selcen. Halil Elhan, Atilla. Gökmen, Derya. Küçükdeveci, Ayşe Adile. Kutlay, Şehim (2019). Analyzing differential item functioning of the Nottingham Health Profile by Mixed Rasch Model, Turk J Phys Med Rehab 2018;64(4):300-307.
- Zeileis A, Hornik K (2007). Generalized M-Fluctuation Tests for Parameter Instability. Statistica Neerlandica, 61(4), 488–508.
- Zeileis A, Hothorn T, Hornik K (2008). Model-Based Recursive Partitioning. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 17(2), 492–514.
- Zumbo, B. D. (2007). Three generations of DIF analyses: Considering where it has been, where it is now, and where it is going. Language Assessmend Quarterly, 4(2), 223-233.