بررسی پایایی و روایی پرسشنامه ارزیابی نوآوری سازمانی آمید و همکاران (2002)

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی

2 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه آزاد واحد علوم تحقیقات

چکیده

هدف اصلی این پژوهش، بررسی پایایی و روایی پرسشنامه نوآوری سازمانی امید و همکاران (2002)، در بین مدیران مدارس ابتدایی، راهنمایی و دبیرستان در شهر تهران می‏باشد. تعداد 308 نفر از مدیران مدارس مقاطع سه‏گانه ابتدایی، راهنمایی و دبیرستان در شهر تهران، به شیوه نمونه‏گیری تصادفی طبقه‏ای با رعایت نسبتها چندمرحله‏ای انتخاب شدند. در مجموع، یافته‏های پژوهش حاضر نشانگر پایایی و روایی مناسب پرسشنامه نوآوری سازمانی امید و همکاران (2002)، می‏باشند. همسانی درونی (آلفای کرونباخ) پرسشنامه کامل، 83/0 به دست آمده است که در واقع میزان قابل قبولی می‏باشد. این میزان آلفا، نشانگر پایایی نسبتاً خوب این پرسشنامه می‏باشد. نتایج همبستگی بین مقیاس‏های پرسشنامه نوآوری سازمانی امید و همکاران (2002)، و همین‏طور با پرسشنامه کامل، نشان‏ دهنده هم‏گرایی این پرسشنامه در سنجش پدیده‏ای واحد می‏باشد. همبستگی مثبت مقیاس‏های پرسشنامه نوآوری سازمانی امید و همکاران (2002)، با یکدیگر، نشان دهنده روایی هم‏گرای مطلوب پرسشنامه نوآوری سازمانی امید و همکاران می‏باشد. از این رو براساس یافته‏های یادشده، پرسشنامه نوآوری سازمانی امید و همکاران (2002)، در فرهنگ ایرانی قابلیت اجرا را دارد.
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Study the validity and reliability of the Questionnaire Assessing Organizational Innovation

نویسندگان [English]

  • Moustafa Nickname 1
  • Ali Taghipour Zahir 1
  • ali delavar 1
  • Mohammad Ghafary Mojalaj 2
چکیده [English]

he aim of this study is to study the of validity and reliability of the Questionnaire Assessing Organizational Innovation. The sample was a totall of 308 managers from educational administers in Tehran City. The results of this study showed that opportune reliability and validity for Questionnaire Assessing Organizational Innovation. The internal consistency coefficient (Chronbach, s alpha) for Questionnaire Assessing Organizational Innovation obtained 0.83. This was relatively high level of Chronbach. S alpha showed relatively high level of reliability. Correlation results among Questionnaire Assessing Organizational Innovation subscales showed convergence at measurement of single phenomenon. The positive correlation of the Questionnaire Assessing Organizational Innovation showed opportune convergent validity.
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Questionnaire Assessing Organizational Innovation
  • reliability
  • validity
  • Educational administers
سرمد، زهره، عباس بازرگان و الهه حجازی. (1383). روش‏های تحقیق در علوم رفتاری. تهران: انتشارات آگاه.

 

 

 

Asheim, Björn (2006). “Organization learning & Creativity and Innovation Understanding the Firm: Spatialand Organizational Dimensions, Oxford: Oxford University Press pp. 214-234;

Christine S. Koberg,Leonard H. Chusmir.(1987).Organizational culture relationships with creativity and other job-related variables.Journal of Business Research, Volume 15, Issue 5, October 1987, Pages 397-408.

Davenport, Elisabeth, widen – wulff, gunilla. (2007). Activity systems, information sharing and the development of organizational knowledge in two finish firms: an exploratory study using activity theory IR. Information research, vol. 12, No.3, PP: 1-16.

Davenport, Elisabeth, widen – wulff, gunilla. (2007). Activity systems, information sharing and the development of organizational knowledge in two finish firms: an exploratory study using activity theory. IRinformationresearch, vol. 12, No.3, PP: 1-16.

Duffy & Jan, “KM (2000). Technology infrastructure, The Information Management Journal, Vol. 34 .No. 2, April, pp. 62-66

Ellen Martine (2009). An organizational culture model to promote Creativity and Innovation. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 2002, 28 (4), 58-65

Furst Bowe , Julie A. and Bauer ,Roy a(2007). Application of the Baldrige Model for Innovation in Higher Education New Directions for Higher Education, No 137, 5 – 14.

George P. Huber (2009). Organizational Learning and Creativity & Innovation Journal of Industrial Psychology, , 38 (4), 102-129.

Hersey , Paul and Blanchard , H. Kenneth and Dowey , Johnson .(1996). Management of Organizational Behavior, 6th ed , Englewood Cliffs , Prentice – Hall.

Hess, Michael and Adams, David (2007). Innovation in Public Management: The role and function of community knowledge. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, Volume 12(1), 2007, article 2.

Hind Benbya(2008). Introduction to Knowledge Management for Creativity and Innovation Minitrack. Journal of Knowledge Management Volume 12, Number 78.pp:121-149.

Hind Benbya(2008). Introduction to Knowledge Management for Creativity and Innovation Minitrack. Journal of Knowledge Management Volume 12, Number 78.pp:121-149.

Joanna Kwasniewska (2006). Organizational climat & Creativity and Innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 187-196, September 2006.

Joanna Kwasniewska .(2006). Organizational climat & Creativity and Innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 187-196, September 2006.

Kerr, B., & Gagliardi, C. (2003). Measuring creativity in research and practice. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.),Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures (pp. 155–169). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Longman, D., (1985).Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations, Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice – Hall,

Maull ,r., & Brown , p. ,& Cliffe ,R.  (2001), Organizational Culture and Quality Improvement : acase study examination, International journal of operations & production Management , vol. 21 No. 3 , 2001 ,pp. 302 -326

McLean, Laird D. (2006). Organizational Culture’s Influence on Creativity and Innovation. Advances in Developing Human Resources Vol. 7, No. 2 May 2005 226-246.

Paraponaris, C. (2003), Third generation R&D and strategies for knowledge management, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 7 No.5, pp.96-106.

Ray Anthony(1999). Organizational Culture & Creativity and Innovation. Innovative Leader Volume 8, Number 1.pp 78-93.

Ray Anthony.(1999). Organizational Culture & Creativity and Innovation. Innovative Leader Volume 8, Number 1.pp 78-93.

Rhoades, L.& et al, (2001). Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support, Journal ofApplied Psychology, Volume 86, pp. 825–836

Runco ,R.F. (2004). Perception of learning culture, concerns about the innovation, and their influence on use of an on-going innovation in the Malaysian public sector (Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia).

Soonhee Kim(2009). Managerial Leadership, the Climate for Creativity and innovation, and a Culture of Innovation and Performance-Driven in Local Government. Paper Prepared for the PMRA Conference 2009 Oct 1-2, 2009Columbus, Ohio

Unesco (2002). Innovations in Non-Formal Education. Bangkok: Unesco . Pob.

Wall, T. D (2005).Creativity, innovation, Learning and Knowledge Management in the Process of Service Development - Results from a Survey of Experts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 774-79

Wall, T. D (2005).Creativity,innovation, Learning and Knowledge Management in the Process of Service Development - Results From a Survey of Experts Journal of Applied Psvchology, 90(5), 774-79

Weedall،M. (2004). A case study of fidelity approach in an educational innovation. The international Journal of Educational management. Vol. 18، No. 1، PP. 49-57.

Weedall،M. (2004). A case study of fidelity approach in an educational innovation. The international Journal of Educational management. Vol. 18، No. 1، PP. 49-57.

Yu, H., Leithwood, k. and Jantzi, D. (2002) The effects of transformational leadership on teachers commitment to change in Hong Kong, Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 368–389.