<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Allameh Tabataba’i University</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Quarterly of Educational Measurement</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2252-004X</Issn>
				<Volume>14</Volume>
				<Issue>54</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2023</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Differential Item Functioning of Academic Alienation Scale’s Items in Psychology and Educational Sciences Students Based on Demographic Characteristics</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Differential Item Functioning of Academic Alienation Scale’s Items in Psychology and Educational Sciences Students Based on Demographic Characteristics</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>6</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>27</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">17380</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22054/jem.2024.59468.2161</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Zahra</FirstName>
					<LastName>Jahanbakhsh</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor, Department of Assessment and Measurement, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0003-1477-0420</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Noorali</FirstName>
					<LastName>Farrokhi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Professor, Department of Assessment and Measurement, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Jalil</FirstName>
					<LastName>Younesi</LastName>
<Affiliation>ATUAssociate Professor, Department of Assessment and Measurement, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>02</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>In order to increase the precision of measurement, survey studies apply scales for the evaluation of latent features. This study aimed to examine differential item functioning (DIF) of Academic Alienation scale items in students based on the Item Response theory (IRT) framework. DIF analysis is used to test the hypothesis if the item parameters for the different groups of identical ability are invariant. DIF analyses of gender and education duration were performed using a sample of 1100 Psychology and educational sciences students in the city of Tehran. The Academic Alienation items (Burbach, 1972) studied were 4-point Likert-type scales. The questionnaire had three subscales: isolation, meaningless, and powerlessness. Analyses were conducted using the graded item response model with likelihood ratio (IRT-LR) tests of DIF. DIF analyses were conducted with 4 anchor items and after Bonferroni adjustment only 3 items based on gender and 2 items according to education duration were detected with meaningful DIF. The explanation of DIF detection can be discussed based on the cultural context of universities. Sexual inequality, teachers’ attitudes, university management policies, and finally educational injustice may be the reasons for the sense of academic alienation in students.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">In order to increase the precision of measurement, survey studies apply scales for the evaluation of latent features. This study aimed to examine differential item functioning (DIF) of Academic Alienation scale items in students based on the Item Response theory (IRT) framework. DIF analysis is used to test the hypothesis if the item parameters for the different groups of identical ability are invariant. DIF analyses of gender and education duration were performed using a sample of 1100 Psychology and educational sciences students in the city of Tehran. The Academic Alienation items (Burbach, 1972) studied were 4-point Likert-type scales. The questionnaire had three subscales: isolation, meaningless, and powerlessness. Analyses were conducted using the graded item response model with likelihood ratio (IRT-LR) tests of DIF. DIF analyses were conducted with 4 anchor items and after Bonferroni adjustment only 3 items based on gender and 2 items according to education duration were detected with meaningful DIF. The explanation of DIF detection can be discussed based on the cultural context of universities. Sexual inequality, teachers’ attitudes, university management policies, and finally educational injustice may be the reasons for the sense of academic alienation in students.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">academic alienation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">attitude measurement</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">demographic characteristics</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">differential item functioning</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">graded response model</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">likelihood ratio approach</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jem.atu.ac.ir/article_17380_b3ba5e210af018d2739580060da5dd19.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
