بررسی ساختار عاملی مقیاس از خود فراروی بزرگسالان(ASTI) در بین دانشجویان دانشگاه بوعلی سینا همدان

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار دانشگاه بوعلی سینا

2 مدرس دانشگاه

3 دانشیار دانشگاه بوعلی سینا

چکیده

هدف بررسی حاضر بررسی ساختار عاملی مقیاس از خود فراروی بزرگسالان در بین دانشجویان دانشگاه بوعلی سینا همدان است. جامعه‌ی آماری این پژوهش کلیه‌ی دانشجویان دانشگاه بوعلی سینا در سال 93 بودند که 300 نفر از آنها با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی انتخاب شدند و به پرسشنامه‌ی پژوهش پاسخ دادند. ابزار مورد استفاده در این پژوهش پرسشنامه‌ی 18 سوالی از خود فراروی بزرگسالان لوینسون بود که در سال 1392 توسط کردنوقابی ترجمه شده است. برای تحلیل داده‌ها از آزمون‌ کرویت بارتلت، کفایت نمونه برداری‌، چرخش واریماکس، تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی و آلفای کرونباخ با نرم افزارSPSS ویراست 18 و تحلیل عاملی تأییدی برای بررسی روایی سازه با نرم افزار لیزرل استفاده شد. یافته‌ها نشان داد که پرسشنامه‌ی از خود فراروی بزرگسالان 3 عامل خود مستقل ؛ کیهان نگری و از خود بیگانگی را می-سنجد. ضریب پایایی درونی( آلفای کرونباخ) برای تمام مولفه‌ها 63/0 است که بر این اساس ابزار مناسبی است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The investigation Factor analysis of the Adult Self-Transcendence Inventory in Bu Ali Sina University students

چکیده [English]

The aim of the present study was to investigate the Factor analysis of the Adult Self-Transcendence Inventory among students in Bu Ali Sina University . The population was all of students in Bu Ali Sina University in 2014-2015 academic years. Research sample was 300 girls and boys students which were selected by using simple random sampling method. The instruments were Adult Self-Transcendence Inventoryand scale. The data collected from the sample were put into SPSS- 18 and were analyzed using statistical methods, Bartlet’s test of sphericity, Kaiser-Olkin Measure, Varimax Method for rotations, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, Cronbach alpha coefficient. The factor analysis findings show that the test measures three factors named: self- independent, cosmic and alienation. The internal reliability coefficient (Cronbach's alpha) for total scale and all factors were high (0.63) and showed appropriate tool. Since wisdom is related to culture, so present study can be obtained factors for assesing the students' wisdom.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • factor analysis Adult Self-Transcendence Inventory
  • validity and reliability
  • students
 Curnow, T. (1999). Wisdom, Intuition, and Ethics, Aldershot, Ashgate.

 Frankel, V. (1966). Self-transcendence as a human phenomenon, Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 6, 97–106.

Garcia-Romeu, A & Alto, P. (2010). SELF-TRANSCENDENCE AS A MEASURABLE TRANSPERSONAL CONSTRUCT, The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology,42(1), 26-47.

Glück, J & Bluck, S. (2011). Laypeople’s conceptions of wisdom and its development: cognitive and integrative views, journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences, 66, 321–324.

Grossmann, I, Karasawa, M, Izumi, S, Na, J, Varnum, M.E. W, Kitayama, S & et al. (2013). Aging and wisdom: culture matters, Psychological Science, 23, 1059–1066.

Jadid-Milani, M, Ashktorab, T, Abed-Saeedi, Zh & Alavi-Majd, H. (2014). Promotion of Self-Transcendence in a Multiple Sclerosis Peer Support Groups, Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 16(5), 73-78.

Kross, E & Grossmann, I. (2012). Boosting wisdom: distance from the self-enhances wise reasoning, atti- tudes, and behavior, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 141, 43–48.

Le, T & Levenson, M. R. (2005). Wisdom: what’s love (and culture) got to do with it, Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 443–457.

Le, T.N. (2008). Cultural values, life experiences and wisdom, Aging and Human development, 66 (4),259-281.

Levenson, M. R, Aldwin, C. M & Cupertino, A. P. (2001). Transcending the self: Towards a liberative model of adult development. In A. L. Neri (Ed), Maturidade & Velhice: Um enfoque multidisciplinary (pp. 99–116). Sao Paulo, Brazil: Papirus.

Levenson, M. R, Jennings, P. A, Aldwin, C. M & Shiraishi, R. W. (2005). Self-Transcendence: Conceptualizations and measurements, International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 60, 127-143.

Levenson, M.R. (2009). Gender and Wisdom: The Roles of Compassion and Moral Development, Research in Human Development, 6 (1), 45–59.

Levitt, H.M. (1999). The Development of Wisdom: An Analysis of Tibetan Buddhist Experience, Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 39 (2), 86- 105.

Markus, H. R & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and Motivation, Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.

Oyserman, D, Cooh, H. N & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism:

Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses, Psychological Bulletin, 128 (1), 3–72.

Park, C. L. (2005). Religion as meaning-making framework in coping with life stress, Journal of Social Issues, 61 (4), 707-729.

Staudinger, U. M & Glück, J. (2011). Psychological wisdom research: commonalities and differences in a growing field, Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 215–241.

Tornstam, L. (1994). Gerotranscendence: A theoretical and empirical exploration. In L. E. Thomas & S.A. Eisenhandler (Eds.), Aging and the religious dimension. London: Auburn House.

Tornstam, L. (1997). Gerotranscendence the contemplative dimension of aging, Journal of Aging Studies, 11, 143–154.